![]() |
|
Welcome to Manhattan Reefs, the premier website for coral reef aquarium owners in the New York City area. You are not currently logged in to our site so you may not be able to access all of the wonderful content and features that we offer. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|    Home | Forums | Photo Gallery | Chat | Reef Database | User CP | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Tools |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Greek god Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Greenwich village
Posts: 446
Reefer Ratings: (11) Friends: (0) | Lighting - How much light is right?
So I've been on a quest to get better colors out of my corals and had moderate success, but I do have a ways to go. My current focus of improvement is the lighting of my tank. I recently went with a new sump as well as a new 150W MH Icecap pendant for it. I have placed a couple frags down in my frag grow out area and have noticed that they "lighten up" significantly (it appears to me that much of the brown zooxanthaellae go away and either the coral is bleaching or starting to show better colors). On my main tank I am using a 400W dual PFO ballast with 2 EVC 10K bulbs hooked into spider reflectors. I also have 2 T5 actinic bulbs as well. My question is...... How much PAR or PPFD should my sps corals be getting? In my sump it seemed to me that they were getting significantly MORE lighting than my main tank. Well, I went out and bought a light meter to confirm this suspicion. My sump light is producing 1200 PPFD (reading taken 4" under the water) while my main tank lighting is only producing 300 PPFD (also taken under 4" of water). I've read that during the summer at noon, the sun produces around 2000 PPFD and 1500 PPFD during the winter. I've also read from Sanjay's website that most bulbs produce 90 PPFD or so.... Yes, no typos in these numbers which is why I'm confused. I've searched around but found no answers so far on what the ideal PPFD is that should be hitting corals. Obviously the answer will be different coral by coral, but I'd like to get a general idea. Can anyone educate me? Nate |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Moderator Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Bronx, NY 10475
Posts: 12,032
Reefer Ratings: (96) Friends: (17) | How much light? Water flow is more important for corals than light, Part V Water flow is more important for corals than light, Part IV Water flow is more important for corals than light, Part III Water flow is more important for corals than light, Part II Water flow is more important for corals than light, Part I |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Moderator Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 4,662
Reefer Ratings: (37) Friends: (0) |
First a quick question: Is the values you give for the sun's PPFD rating at a particular depth? Corals like nutrients! They can make most of it through photosynthesis using the zoox to generate amino acids. Bacteria living in the tissue and Ca carbonate skeleton can also undergo nitrogen fixation, generating nitrate, glutamate and glutamine. These building blocks for biosynthesis, when available, cause the coral to grow (I am mostly talking about SPS). So the answer to your question depends on many factors and how they all are available for the coral to use. These factor include and a not limited to: zoox presence at proper density, symbiotic bacterial presence for N-fixation, bacterial plankton and phytoplankton availablility, Ca and carbonate concentrations, quality of water for light penetration, and flow to remove waste and bring nutrients/food. So light while extrememly important is one factor of many. Having lower par light BUT high nutrient availability that can be directly bioassimilated can cancel each other out such that the former will compensate for the decreased photosynthesis of the zoox.
__________________ "I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." - James Madison, to the Virginia ratifying Convention, June 16, 1788. "I sincerely believe.....that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies, and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity under the name of funding is but swindling futurity on a large scale." -Thomas Jefferson Last edited by ShaunW; 06-25-2007 at 12:13 PM. |
| | |
| | #5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Washington Heights, NY
Posts: 1,801
Reefer Ratings: (20) Friends: (4) |
Hey Nate, Your probably not going to get a lot of answers because this is a tough question. If your concerned with colors I wouldn't worry too much about par. I would worry more about filtration and then about the wavelengths of light hitting the tank. I started looking around about this early last year, read a few days but didn't have time to really go deep into it. Plus, we all keep a lot of different species in the tank so how one coral reacts to certain light is not necessarily how another coral will react. I've seen a lot of Japanese tanks which really try to hit the corals with different colors of light. So my advice is get get some lumenarcs, go down to 250 mh so your not wasting electricty and make sure your filtration is the best it can be. Here's a post I made last year kinda on the subject.
__________________ Paul Last edited by kimoyo; 06-24-2007 at 11:03 PM. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| | |
| | #6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Greek god Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Greenwich village
Posts: 446
Reefer Ratings: (11) Friends: (0) |
Deanos, thanks for the links. I read through the first one so far and it was exactly what I was looking for. It seems that overall 200-400 Par is the zone that works best for sps corals.
Also I would like to say that I agree that there are MANY other important factors (nutrient levels, spectrum, etc...) that are extremely vital as well for good coral growth and coloration, but it seems that an obvious and simple factor has got to be a reasonable amount of PAR hitting the corals. Many times the basics get overlooked. My next goal will be to test a few other tanks that have good coloration and see if anything interesting pops up. Nate | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| | |
| | #8 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Hoboken
Posts: 1,681
Reefer Ratings: (6) Friends: (4) |
in my limited experience with SPS, the thing that effects my colors the most is unstable alkalinity. For example if i make an adjustment to my Ca Alk dosage and don't go extremely slow, the colors fade. You said you are having problems with frags fading in the sump correct? I imagine you Ca Alk is being dosed directly into the sump? Not much water volume in comparison to the entire system, Alkalinity certainly could swing quite a bit in the sump before it is circulated throughout your system. Just a theory. ![]() |
| | |
| | #9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Greek god Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Greenwich village
Posts: 446
Reefer Ratings: (11) Friends: (0) |
And to clarify about the frag colors in my sump... It isn't that I have good colors in my main tank and bad colors in my sump, it is the case that frags in my sump have lost much of their brown color because of more intense lighting down there. I'm not happy with the colors in either area. Nate | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |