Manhattan Reefs  

Welcome to Manhattan Reefs, the premier website for coral reef aquarium owners in the New York City area.

You are not currently logged in to our site so you may not be able to access all of the wonderful content and features that we offer. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.

User Name
Password
   Home Forums Photo Gallery Chat Reef Database User CP Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Tools

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-22-2007, 08:40 PM   #1
Greek god
gnatp2's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Greenwich village
Posts: 446
Reefer Ratings: (11)
Friends: (0)
View My Gallery Send a Private Message
Donation Level 2 
Lighting - How much light is right?

So I've been on a quest to get better colors out of my corals and had moderate success, but I do have a ways to go. My current focus of improvement is the lighting of my tank. I recently went with a new sump as well as a new 150W MH Icecap pendant for it. I have placed a couple frags down in my frag grow out area and have noticed that they "lighten up" significantly (it appears to me that much of the brown zooxanthaellae go away and either the coral is bleaching or starting to show better colors).

On my main tank I am using a 400W dual PFO ballast with 2 EVC 10K bulbs hooked into spider reflectors. I also have 2 T5 actinic bulbs as well.

My question is...... How much PAR or PPFD should my sps corals be getting? In my sump it seemed to me that they were getting significantly MORE lighting than my main tank. Well, I went out and bought a light meter to confirm this suspicion. My sump light is producing 1200 PPFD (reading taken 4" under the water) while my main tank lighting is only producing 300 PPFD (also taken under 4" of water).

I've read that during the summer at noon, the sun produces around 2000 PPFD and 1500 PPFD during the winter. I've also read from Sanjay's website that most bulbs produce 90 PPFD or so.... Yes, no typos in these numbers which is why I'm confused. I've searched around but found no answers so far on what the ideal PPFD is that should be hitting corals. Obviously the answer will be different coral by coral, but I'd like to get a general idea.

Can anyone educate me?
Nate
gnatp2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2007, 10:36 PM   #2
Greek god
gnatp2's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Greenwich village
Posts: 446
Reefer Ratings: (11)
Friends: (0)
View My Gallery Send a Private Message
Donation Level 2 
Hello people???? This should be interesting. Lets get it going.
gnatp2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2007, 10:57 PM   #3
Moderator
Deanos's Avatar
Moderator: This member is a Moderator. - Issue reason:  
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bronx, NY 10475
Posts: 12,032
Reefer Ratings: (96)
Friends: (17)
View My Gallery Send a Private Message
Donation Level 6 
How much light?

Water flow is more important for corals than light, Part V

Water flow is more important for corals than light, Part IV

Water flow is more important for corals than light, Part III

Water flow is more important for corals than light, Part II

Water flow is more important for corals than light, Part I
__________________
Need help or have a question?

Click the avatar below:


Deanos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2007, 10:58 PM   #4
Moderator
ShaunW's Avatar
Moderator: This member is a Moderator. - Issue reason:  
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 4,662
Reefer Ratings: (37)
Friends: (0)
View My Gallery Send a Private Message
First a quick question: Is the values you give for the sun's PPFD rating at a particular depth?

Corals like nutrients! They can make most of it through photosynthesis using the zoox to generate amino acids. Bacteria living in the tissue and Ca carbonate skeleton can also undergo nitrogen fixation, generating nitrate, glutamate and glutamine. These building blocks for biosynthesis, when available, cause the coral to grow (I am mostly talking about SPS). So the answer to your question depends on many factors and how they all are available for the coral to use. These factor include and a not limited to: zoox presence at proper density, symbiotic bacterial presence for N-fixation, bacterial plankton and phytoplankton availablility, Ca and carbonate concentrations, quality of water for light penetration, and flow to remove waste and bring nutrients/food. So light while extrememly important is one factor of many. Having lower par light BUT high nutrient availability that can be directly bioassimilated can cancel each other out such that the former will compensate for the decreased photosynthesis of the zoox.
__________________
"I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations."
- James Madison, to the Virginia ratifying Convention, June 16, 1788.

"I sincerely believe.....that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies, and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity under the name of funding is but swindling futurity on a large scale."
-Thomas Jefferson

Last edited by ShaunW; 06-25-2007 at 12:13 PM.
ShaunW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2007, 11:01 PM   #5
Senior Member
kimoyo's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington Heights, NY
Posts: 1,801
Reefer Ratings: (20)
Friends: (4)
View My Gallery Send a Private Message
Hey Nate,

Your probably not going to get a lot of answers because this is a tough question. If your concerned with colors I wouldn't worry too much about par. I would worry more about filtration and then about the wavelengths of light hitting the tank. I started looking around about this early last year, read a few days but didn't have time to really go deep into it. Plus, we all keep a lot of different species in the tank so how one coral reacts to certain light is not necessarily how another coral will react. I've seen a lot of Japanese tanks which really try to hit the corals with different colors of light. So my advice is get get some lumenarcs, go down to 250 mh so your not wasting electricty and make sure your filtration is the best it can be. Here's a post I made last year kinda on the subject.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kimoyo View Post
The thing is, its not all about par when it comes to growth and coloration because par is really just measuring the intensity of light emitted. While par is important I think the spectrum is important also.

This is a quote posted by mojoreef in this thread, Lets talk about ~Lighting~ (a very good read).

>Pocilloporin primarily absorbs green/yellow (550-600 nm) light along with some upper UV-A . it emmits a orange/red
>highly fluorescent pocilloporins primarily absorbs light from 310 to 380 nm (UV-B and UV-A) and then fluoresces this as light from 400 to 470 nm (violet/blue).
>highly fluorescent pocilloporin primarily absorbs light from 380 to 470 nm (UV-A, violet and blue) and fluoresces light from 475 to 520 nm (blue and green).
>third type of highly fluorescent pocilloporin primarily absorbs light from 430 to 490 nm (violet and blue) and fluoresces light from 490 to 540 nm (green/yellow).
>Yellow fluorescing pocilloporin primarily absorbs light from 440 to 500 nm (blue) and fluoresces light from 520 to 620 nm (green, yellow and orange).
>Red/Orange Fluorescing pocilloporin that primarily absorbs light from 500 to 540 nm (green) and fluoresces light with wavelengths that are primarily orange to red.

To understand this just read that thread, but fluoresces basically means the color you see. So if you take into consideration coloring highest par doesn't mean its the best for the corals. To get some good fluorescence you want to be hitting the corals with 310-380 light. Take a look at this graph from Sanjay website (don't worry about the axis titles, all this basically means is the higher value the more light at that wavelength).



Whereas the xm has the highest par (great for growth), you can see how it lacks in that fluorescence range but the ushio (lower par) doesn't.

And here's a graph comparing the ushio with the blv.



Very similar but the ushio has a slightly higher par. Thats why (and with its CCT) I'm somewhat surprised its more yellow. But the blv is looking like the way to go, unless the reeflux has a similar spectrum.
__________________
Paul

Last edited by kimoyo; 06-24-2007 at 11:03 PM.
kimoyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 11:56 PM   #6
Greek god
gnatp2's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Greenwich village
Posts: 446
Reefer Ratings: (11)
Friends: (0)
View My Gallery Send a Private Message
Donation Level 2 
Deanos, thanks for the links. I read through the first one so far and it was exactly what I was looking for. It seems that overall 200-400 Par is the zone that works best for sps corals.

Quote:
Originally Posted by solbby View Post
First a quick question: Is the values you give for the sun's PPFD rating at a particular depth?
I really don't know how that reading is taken which is why I am confused. I'm only guessing that the 2000 PPFD statement that I've been reading is not at any depth whatsoever but I really don't know. Here's the quote from the first Deanos link: "Photosynthetically Active Radiation (PAR) in units of micromole photons per square meter per second (µmol·m˛·sec; as a point of reference, sunlight at noon on a cloudless day in Hawai’i can be as high as 2,200 µmol·m˛·sec )."


Quote:
Originally Posted by solbby View Post
Having lower par light BUT high nutrient availability that can be directly bioassimilated can cancel each other out such that the former will compensate for the decreased photosynthesis of the zoox.
My tank has had <1 Nitrates for months and .03 phosphates for about 1 month now. I have finally started to see improvement in colors for the corals that are higher up in the tank in the past 2 weeks. The corals that are in shaded or lower regions of the tank have not shown improvement though. They grow well, but have brown colors. I'm thinking that this is an example of your statement about high nutrient availability but low par due to the large populations of zoox on the corals to compensate for the lack of light. (Pls clarify if I am misunderstanding you)

Also I would like to say that I agree that there are MANY other important factors (nutrient levels, spectrum, etc...) that are extremely vital as well for good coral growth and coloration, but it seems that an obvious and simple factor has got to be a reasonable amount of PAR hitting the corals. Many times the basics get overlooked.

My next goal will be to test a few other tanks that have good coloration and see if anything interesting pops up.

Nate
gnatp2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2007, 09:26 AM   #7
I, AM A RANGER!
Slamajamajama's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brooklyn, 11223
Posts: 787
Reefer Ratings: (14)
Friends: (11)
View My Gallery Send a Private Message
good info here...
Slamajamajama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2007, 11:06 AM   #8
Wes
Senior Member
Wes's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hoboken
Posts: 1,681
Reefer Ratings: (6)
Friends: (4)
View My Gallery Send a Private Message
Donation Level 2 
in my limited experience with SPS, the thing that effects my colors the most is unstable alkalinity. For example if i make an adjustment to my Ca Alk dosage and don't go extremely slow, the colors fade.

You said you are having problems with frags fading in the sump correct? I imagine you Ca Alk is being dosed directly into the sump? Not much water volume in comparison to the entire system, Alkalinity certainly could swing quite a bit in the sump before it is circulated throughout your system. Just a theory.
Wes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2007, 08:37 PM   #9
Greek god
gnatp2's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Greenwich village
Posts: 446
Reefer Ratings: (11)
Friends: (0)
View My Gallery Send a Private Message
Donation Level 2 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wes View Post
in my limited experience with SPS, the thing that effects my colors the most is unstable alkalinity. For example if i make an adjustment to my Ca Alk dosage and don't go extremely slow, the colors fade.

You said you are having problems with frags fading in the sump correct? I imagine you Ca Alk is being dosed directly into the sump? Not much water volume in comparison to the entire system, Alkalinity certainly could swing quite a bit in the sump before it is circulated throughout your system. Just a theory.
Wes, good advice about stability. There is an excellent thread on this board about the importance of stability in a reef tank. I am dripping my 2 part into my sump, but it is in the return chamber which should solve any issue with concentrated dosing right next to corals

And to clarify about the frag colors in my sump... It isn't that I have good colors in my main tank and bad colors in my sump, it is the case that frags in my sump have lost much of their brown color because of more intense lighting down there. I'm not happy with the colors in either area.

Nate
gnatp2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2007, 10:47 PM   #10
Tim
Tim`s Aquatics
Tim's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Rockland County
Posts: 1,045
Reefer Ratings: (15)
Friends: (0)
View My Gallery Send a Private Message
Donation Level 3 
Hay Nate do you want to come up to Rockland to check the par in my two tanks? LMK Tim......
Tim is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:02 PM.