Manhattan Reefs
 

Welcome to Manhattan Reefs, the premier website for coral reef aquarium owners in the New York City area.

You are not currently logged in to our site so you may not be able to access all of the wonderful content and features that we offer. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.

User Name
Password
   Home Forums Market Chat Stores Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read About MR


Reply
 
Share LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-08-2007, 04:56 AM
OG Member
Pseudo's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 3,578
Reefer Ratings: (84 (100%)
Friends: (14)
Send a Private Message
If the discussion here cannot be civil I will have to close the thread. All opinions are welcome here. Not everyones methods are correct and no one person has all the answers to sucessful reefkeeping. Read other comments and sucess stories and decide for yourself what you want to take from each experience and enjoy the hobby.

Kasei
__________________
It takes one to know one!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2007, 09:19 AM
Ras Tafari
smoknreefrs's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Englewood NJ
Posts: 376
Reefer Ratings: (5 (100%)
Friends: (3)
Send a Private Message
Quote:
Originally Posted by loismustdie View Post
I see you are fairly new to the site. You may not know about some of what has gone on and things from other threads which led to this one. It is a topic of discussion. Obviously by your response, I feel that you do not understand what is being said.
I'm not being argumentative either. This is a discussion forum. We are having a discussion. Before you critique me, you may want to get to know me first. Everything is all cool here before you walked in calling people silly.
If you would go to your mom and have her explain to you that my argument here is that fuges have very little impact on ones tank. As in my other post, I said that the room being used for fuges as well as time and maintenance, can be put towards better stuff which actually does have an impact. My silly statement of fuges and maintenance was just my way of saying fuges aren't all bad. There is better stuff out there though. They have their application and that it is a combination of techniques.
As you are here longer and go through more threads, you will see many noob's having problems and they run fuges. Guys in the advanced forums, don't have these problems and find fuges pointless and don't use them.
You will also see people correcting PO4 issues simply by removing fuges. Many of us have gotten away from Salifert PO4 kits and went Hanna. Can you say H-A-N-N-A? These are more accurate kits which are geared towards those who keep more difficult stuff and the term "I can tell what is wrong with my tank by looking at it" (like noobies frequently do), just isn't good enough. Most who ran fuges and actually tested (many don't) they found the parroted response of "I have a fuge, my PO4 and NO3 are low"... to be false.
Rather than coming in here and telling me how silly I am and how great fuges are, why not become part of the discussion and tell us about your experiences? My point in posting here was for people to prove me wrong about fuges. Would you like to do it? I'd be happy to see the pics.
This is a discussion. Please feel free to be a part of it.
you would add a disclaimer saying you arent being argumentive, if in fact you didnt feel that your words would cause an argument.

i am not new to the hobby or to the site per se, i have been following many threads, and just recently joined in the past few months. i just dont post much.

i refuse to have pi$$ing contests, or to prove or disprove anything, and ive been using hanna looooooong before you guys group buys of the kit and not just the few that are mentioned in this forum (i have a hook). in addition i have no drive to prove you wrong or any one else for that matter. those who have fuges and were successful in doing keeping them, already know the benefit fo having one. ill let those people who arent "noobs" chime in, then maybe their words will be heard instead of scorn.

if my previous post were taken to heart i apologize, those were not my intentions.
__________________
If you fail to prepare, you prepare to fail.
Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2007, 09:31 AM
Senior Member
Dace's Avatar
Swap Crew:  - Issue reason:  
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 6,573
Reefer Ratings: (158 (99%)
Friends: (52)
Send a Private Message
Chris i just posted pics of my DT. i'll post pics in a few.
Quote:
Originally Posted by loismustdie View Post
Lissa: doesn't count. No FTS. I do like your little set up though and for your purposes (small tank with a few fish who benefit from pods), that may be a very good use of space for you.
Eric: Doesn't count. Needs to be an updated FTS. I know by your livestock, that is not an updated photo. That was when you first set up the tank. ANYONE can have a nice tank for a few months. It's longevity that matters.
Ming: that is not a refugium. That is a reef with algae in it. Either way, beautiful. Interesting tanks.
Dgthrasher: I got nothing for you. I will not blame your fuge for that mess. I'd blame poor husbandry and lack of water changes.
1 nice tank is all we got in 24 + hours.
and so are fuges.
Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2007, 09:32 AM
Senior Member
Dace's Avatar
Swap Crew:  - Issue reason:  
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 6,573
Reefer Ratings: (158 (99%)
Friends: (52)
Send a Private Message
Quote:
Originally Posted by loismustdie View Post
Honestly Lissa, those who use a fuge and have good husbandry practices, have nice tanks. Those who don't, don't.
I feel fuges (in your application) are pretty good, but overall, have little impact on water quality when properly set up, but have bad drawbacks when improperly set/maintained or as Wingo brought up... crashes.
All i keep in my tank is cheatos to avoid any type of crash or sexual peoblems

Last edited by Daceman; 04-08-2007 at 09:44 AM..
Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2007, 10:16 AM
ReefsMagazine!
jhale's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: G.V NYC
Posts: 15,399
Reefer Ratings: (43 (100%)
Friends: (38)
Send a Private Message
Quote:
Originally Posted by ellebelle View Post
Who uses refugiums? For what purpose(s) (pods, nitrate export, place to keep naughty fish, second tank)? How have you set them up? Do you think it's been a benefit or detriment to your system? I've noticed a lot of discussion of fuges in other threads and thought it might be worthwhile to have a thread about them in and of itself.
Let's shift this back to answering Lissa's original questions.
Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2007, 11:04 AM
OG of this here reef game
fritz's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Marine Park
Posts: 3,569
Reefer Ratings: (36 (95%)
Friends: (5)
Send a Private Message
As a side note when Frener and company started preaching the good of fuges they were talking about LARGE fuges. At least 50% of your total system volume being a dedicated fuge. John, yours would not qualify in fact they would say "better than nothing but I doubt it will have much of an impact"
(wetwebmedia.com)

To use a sump that is 30% of your display and section a part of that off as a fuge just isn't what they were advocating. They were advocating very large fuges, or at best swap your sump and your display! Use your display as a fuge and turn your sump into your display. (I call that cheating, but it works)

Adding a fuge that is 5%-20% of your total volume won't have much of an impact. They're great for growing pods and other such things. John, I believe Calfo said algae should be harvested weekly (or bi-weekly maybe) for best effect. You don't want the algae to grow so abundant that it starts to lack in resources. It should always be "behind the curve" so to speak.

Also the sand bed in your fuge should be more than 5 inches deep people! More than 8 would be even better and make sure it's abundant with life. You don't need sand sifters but there should be TONS of worms and other such animals turning that over and going through it constantly. Remember this is a refugium so there shouldn't be anything in there that is eating them, they should multiply like crazy.
__________________
Advertise Here
Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2007, 11:53 AM
ReefsMagazine!
jhale's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: G.V NYC
Posts: 15,399
Reefer Ratings: (43 (100%)
Friends: (38)
Send a Private Message
okay at least I have a 8" DSB

Like other apartment living people I don't have the room for a 120 gallon fuge. well I would but it would take up some living space.

I wonder would a second tank filled with a DSB and turtle grass qualify as a fuge? it could be a second biotope tied into a SP.S dominant tank.
Kind of what ming tried but just with more algae. you could keep pipefish in it, I bet you would never have to feed the tank.
Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2007, 11:58 AM
Senior Member
lunner's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brooklyn / CNY
Posts: 805
Reefer Ratings: (30 (100%)
Friends: (4)
Send a Private Message
I restart a mixed reef (SPS dominate from frags) for almost 9 months now and setup a sump/fudge since the beginning. I think there are many ways to setup a fuge with different sizes for difference purpose. Since my tank is Fairy Wrasses dominate, I used mine for pods/food growth. I do water changes (10-20%) at least once a month, usually twice a month.

Before I trim back this weekend:


After Trim: (Fairy Wrasse waiting for pickup today & LR in bucket.)


Tank 4-7-07:

Tank 2-25-07


Some SPS:


Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2007, 03:51 PM
ccr
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Long Island
Posts: 12
Reefer Ratings: (1 (100%)
Friends: (0)
Send a Private Message
I am out of the house at the moment. I will post a picture later.

I will start with a simple statement. A refugium is not a substitute for good husbandry. I have heard folks out there with apparent success and little water change. I would not suggest it for the masses. If the stars align for a lucky few, I am happy for them. I went through a period of a few months with no water change and my chemistry went awry; nitrates when up and I had an aptasia bloom. It took me two months to get my levels down and eliminate the aptasia. I am back o regular water changes.

I have a 30 gallon breeder with a large CPR hang-on refugium. I have been maturing my sand and rock for 12 months with no fish or corals. I suppose you would call my entire system a refugium. That will change this year.

I keep chaetomorpha in the CPR hang-on, running a reverse light cycle. I have many (1/4" size) snails, all from reproduction in the tank along with about a dozen small hermits and 3 nassarius snails. My nitrates are zero, but my phosphates are elevated (1 ppm). Since this number has risen lately, I retested my tap water - 3ppm from the tap. I have to conclude my tank is acting as a phosphate reducer - my tank has a lower phosphate level than my tap water. I will now have to treat my water to reduce phospates before the water goes into the tank.

Some future plans - I will be upgrading to a 40 gallon breeder, adding a 35 gallon sump (that will include a 18 gallon 6" DSB fuge compartment). I also plan to add a second tank with rock and some sand. Primarily for pod development and because I like rockscaping.
Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2007, 05:45 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: westchester/work NYC
Posts: 427
Reefer Ratings: (15 (100%)
Friends: (1)
Send a Private Message
fuges

my experience, pardon me if I mispell, food & jameson whiskey makes hard to type. I had a 120 RR tank with a 60gal fuge(mangrove plants per Marrone) I had only 3 fish in the tank, small yellow tang,madarin & six-line wrasse. I never fed the tank in 2 years, pods,worms etc. here's the killer no skimming. corals grew at a faster rate than in my berlin method tank.
no algae break outs because no food to decay.

low bioload means it can work.

danny
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes