• Why not take a moment to introduce yourself to our members?

A

Anonymous

Guest
Study: Only 10 percent of big ocean fish remain
By Marsha Walton
CNN


(CNN) --A new global study concludes that 90 percent of all large fishes have disappeared from the world's oceans in the past half century, the devastating result of industrial fishing.

The study, which took 10 years to complete and was published in the international journal Nature this week, paints a grim picture of the Earth's current populations of such species as sharks, swordfish, tuna and marlin.

The authors used data going back 47 years from nine oceanic and four continental shelf systems, ranging from the tropics to the Antarctic. Whether off the coast of Newfoundland, Canada, or in the Gulf of Thailand, the findings were dire, according to the authors.

"I think the point is there is nowhere left in the ocean not overfished," said Ransom Myers, a fisheries biologist at Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia and lead author of the study.

Some in the fishing industry took issue with the tone of the report.

"I'm sure there are areas of the world with that level of depletion, but other areas are in good shape," said Lorne Clayton, with the Canadian Highly Migratory Species Foundation, a foundation that supports the sustainable development of the tuna industry.

He said some abuses of the past have ended: Long drift nets are illegal, untended longlines are illegal, and many countries adhere to elaborate systems of licensing, quotas and third party observers working on boats.

Yet Clayton agreed that there remains much room for improvement.

"It's important to keep these issues in front of the public. That puts pressure on the fisheries and agencies to keep cleaning up their act," he said.

According to the report, the big declines in the numbers of large fishes began when industrial fishing started in the early 1950s.

"Whether it is yellowfin tuna in the tropics, bluefin in cold waters, or albacore tuna in between, the pattern is always the same. There is a rapid decline of fish numbers," Myers said.

Co-author Boris Worm said the losses are having major impacts on the ocean ecosystems.

The predatory fish are like "the lions and tigers of the sea," said Worm, a marine ecologist with the Institute for Marine Science in Kiel, Germany.

"The changes that will occur due to the decline of these species are hard to predict and difficult to understand. However, they will occur on a global scale, and I think this is the real reason for concern."

Going the way of the dinosaurs?
In many cases, the fish numbers plummeted fastest during the first years after fleets moved into new areas, often before anyone knew the drops were taking place.

A few decades ago, longline fishing would catch about 10 big fish per 100 hooks. Now the norm is one fish per 100, with fish about half the weight of earlier years, Myers said.

Longlining, among the most widespread of fishing methods, uses miles of baited hooks to catch a wide range of species.

Myers warned that the world's great fish could go the way of the dinosaurs if immediate action is not taken.

"Humans have always been very good at killing big animals," Myers said. "Ten thousand years ago, with just some pointed sticks, humans managed to wipe out the woolly mammoth, saber tooth tigers, mastodons and giant vampire bats. The same could happen in the oceans."

Some representatives of the fishing industry say the picture is not as bleak as the Nature authors indicate.

"For tuna, the analysis is restricted to data from longline fisheries that catch only relatively old individuals, which comprise a small part of the stock," said Robin Allen, of the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission.

According to the commission, a greater reduction would be expected in that age-group compared to the tuna stock as a whole.

Worm said he hopes this "big picture" study of the world's fish populations will serve as a wake up call to governments, global fishing conglomerates and environmental groups.

"People haven't before seen how bad this is," said Worm. "It doesn't make any sense, economically or ecologically, to ignore this."

Solutions in the water
While the numbers are alarming, Worm said there are solutions.

In the past when certain fishing areas have been declared off limits and fishing restrictions have been enforced, certain fish and shellfish populations rebounded "amazingly quickly," he said.

Haddock, yellowtail and scallops have recovered in different regions.

"The ocean is full of surprises," Worm said. But with numbers down so dramatically in every part of the world, the situation cannot be ignored for long, he said.

Myers said many of the world's fishing commissions and governments have tried to wish away the problem for years. Reversing the decline, he suggested, would require cutting back fishing by as much as 60 percent.

Clayton said that technological advances were already responsible for improvements. Hi-tech equipment on fleets from many developed countries reduce the by-catch, the fish and other animals caught as by-products of the target fish.

But a huge technological gap still exists between the fishing fleets of rich and poor nations, Clayton said.

He said it makes economic sense for the fishing industry to adhere to conservation measures, and to look at the expansion of aquaculture (fish farming) as part of the answer to dwindling fish numbers.








Find this article at:
http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/science/05 ... index.html
 

texman

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It is a very sad thing indeed. The Billfish Foundation has been saying this for many years. Sport fishing enthusiasts like myself put more than 1000X the number of dollars into the economy vs long line boats, and almost all billfish are released alive by sport fisherman. On the other hand, since long liners cannot keep marlin when they are caught as bi-catch in the tuna and swordfish industry, they are thrown back into the ocean dead by the thousands. Unfortunately, because of the recent increased demand for fresh tuna by both Americans and moreso by Asians, tuna fishing is on the increase worldwide. Although US, Mexican, and Asian governments have been aware of the problem for many years, very little has been done to remedy the situation, and soon, there will be too few fish swimming to find each other to mate. For those who think that they will want to see a live marlin in their lifetime, I suggest you get out there soon, since they will probably become extinct in a few years.
 

Modo

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
"Humans have always been very good at killing big animals," Myers said. "Ten thousand years ago, with just some pointed sticks, humans managed to wipe out the woolly mammoth, saber tooth tigers, mastodons and giant vampire bats. The same could happen in the oceans."

:roll:

I understand the urgency and emotion of the researchers involved, but it's statements like this that just add to the barrier between the two sides. Stick to the facts and let the results found speak for themselves.

Sorry, but I keep seeing more and more of this in the media these days when someone has a valid point and blabs a little too much and ends up hurting their cause.
 

leftovers

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
actually there is a direct correlateion between the presence of man and those animals decline and where ever man showed up the mammoth and other larg e mammels either declined or were redered exitinct. More modern examples are the dodo bird, the grey whale and other whale species, the buffalo....all of which were large animals that saw their populations slaughtered to fuel or feed or for fun the human species
 

Modo

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I don't want to get into an off topic debate. Yes, humans did help in the decline of these species. Did they "Wipe Out" these species? No. I believe the giant ice cap that covers ther grass they ate did. Did man stab to death every Sabre Tooth Tiger? No, but eating alot of the Mammoths before the Saber Tooth could didn't help.

I agree whole heartdly about the results of the study. I just got a very "activist" tone from the news report. Something that shouldn't over shadow the facts

Myer's has done a HUGE amount of work on this study. I just looked him up and he has some really good info on his University web page.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I don't know that this was too terribly activist in tone. After hearing some commercial fishermen say that the fishing in their waters is as good as it has been in a few years, without referencing thier perceptions with long term trends, I think statements like the mammoth example need to be made to jolt some people to reality.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
"Humans have always been very good at killing big animals," Myers said. "Ten thousand years ago, with just some pointed sticks, humans managed to wipe out the woolly mammoth, saber tooth tigers, mastodons and giant vampire bats. The same could happen in the oceans."

I agree that this statement is a bunch of crap. There is absolutely no evidence for this statement. Everything I have ever read about it is conjecture.
 

Saltykirk

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Well, we have game wardens to prevent poaching of deer & other game animals to prevent man made decline. The oceans don't have any game wardens. People are not allowed to hunt deer & sell the meat and it has to be controlled to prevent localized extinction, like what happened in W. KY several years ago. The ocean needs managed like any other natural resource. It makes me so disappointed in the breakdown of the human thinking process when the tree huggers come out screaming like a bunch of bad actors in a B grade war movie. They yell don't hunt, kill, collect, catch, or touch anything. To pretend or deny mankind hasn't been the one to blame for extinction of certain species is an irresponsible load of crap. Think about it guys, decline of species numbers in the oceans is a very likely scenario. Fishing companies & other countrie spend money to get it ignored. That is why environmental groups come after the smaller & poorer marine fish hobby.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Saltykirk

To pretend or deny mankind hasn't been the one to blame for extinction of certain species is an irresponsible load of crap.

I don't deny that mankind is to blame for the extinction of certain species. What I don't believe is that they did it to the Wooly Mammoth and Sabre Tooth tiger 10,000 years ago.
 

Saltykirk

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Ahhhh.... there I agree w/ you 100%. I hope my post didn't seem directed at you. I didn't mean for it to appear that way supercow. I think it hard to see man causing extinction back then as well. :oops: To list cro mag species & others is a little reaching effort on the part of green groups.
:lol:
In todays time however, we can record & study w/o cave paintings lol. Certain groups want to go after the marine hobby because we are an easier target than the food fishing industry.
 

Sponsor Reefs

We're a FREE website, and we exist because of hobbyists like YOU who help us run this community.

Click here to sponsor $10:


Top