• Why not take a moment to introduce yourself to our members?

WRASSER

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
:? Every now and then i will put a full leaf of lettuce in the tank for the fish to snack on. The question is, is lettuce more toxic than silver sides or even pellet or flake foods? i 8O I know poop is poop, but is there bad poop and good poop :?: 8O :D
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
As long as you remove any trace of pesticides I don't think lettuce is bad as a snack. I wouldn't do it for a staple food though because I question the nutritional value.

Dried Nori or Laver would be a better snack though ;)
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Unsalted Nori would be better, but if you must use lettuce, Romain would be better, as would Broccoli(better than lettuce), but you have to freeze it first - other wise your fish's stomach cant break down the vegitable matter efficiently.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
beaslbob":1fj2swxr said:
live macros are the best.

Is this the same live macro that you believe removed all of the nasty toxins from the water column? I'm surprised that you believe it would be healthy to feed this toxic soup to your fish. :wink:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Guy":8x3rcuf2 said:
beaslbob":8x3rcuf2 said:
live macros are the best.

Is this the same live macro that you believe removed all of the nasty toxins from the water column? I'm surprised that you believe it would be healthy to feed this toxic soup to your fish. :wink:

Yes Guy it is the same live macro that is being harvested monthly removing the toxins from the tank. So that after a short time there are toxins levels acceptable for the livestock. (edit)And the same plant life that maintains the ocean. (/edit)

Much better (then) dead plant life rotting in the tank. From sources unknown and therefore polutants unknown.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
beaslbob":xdycsu7n said:
Guy":xdycsu7n said:
beaslbob":xdycsu7n said:
live macros are the best.

Is this the same live macro that you believe removed all of the nasty toxins from the water column? I'm surprised that you believe it would be healthy to feed this toxic soup to your fish. :wink:

Yes Guy it is the same live macro that is being harvested monthly removing the toxins from the tank. So that after a short time there are toxins levels acceptable for the livestock. (edit)And the same plant life that maintains the ocean. (/edit)

Much better (then) dead plant life rotting in the tank. From sources unknown and therefore polutants unknown.

I agree that live macro is an excellent food source. I was just surprised you think so as well.

So basically, as long as you know what the toxins are then it's OK to feed them to your fish? I can't agree with that. Your telling people that adding toxins to the tank is fine as long as algae is present to sequester the toxins and then you say it's fine to feed the toxins to your fish. Pretty bizzare.

I've never had Nori or Laver last long enough to rot in the tank.
 

wade1

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Jumping into this a little belatedly, but what are you referring to as toxins?

NH4+, NO2-, NO3- are all toxic if you have enough of them. Taken into plants they are converted into protein where they are not toxic.

Alcohols, terpenes, big ketones, etc would generally not even be taken up by the plant (they would get consumed as substrates for bacteria) unless they were small enough.

Real toxins, like pesticides, and such, have such a low rate of transfer across membranes that plants are an irrelevant source of removal from a system, but even if they were, they are typically resistant to breakdown and therefore would remain toxic to your livestock.

Metals might be helped out of the system by heavy plant loading, but as a matter of fact, they are not removed by the plants themselves, but by the anaerobic zones created near the roots where water doesn't penentrate too well (ie- copper) and the reaction is either microbial of chemical (Cu sulfate formed).

Generalizing that macros remove toxins is somewhat bogus... and then if you are referring to real toxins, not just toxic byproducts of simple metabolism, those generalizations are either wrong or the advice is bad.

Just thought I'd throw a little more depth to the discussion. :)
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
beaslbob":13iousjh said:
Yes Guy it is the same live macro that is being harvested monthly removing the toxins from the tank. So that after a short time there are toxins levels acceptable for the livestock. (edit)And the same plant life that maintains the ocean. (/edit)

Much better (then) dead plant life rotting in the tank. From sources unknown and therefore polutants unknown.
feeding your fish the same macros you're using to remove toxins from your tank...isnt that to an extent, defeating the whole purpose of your refugium? You're just putting those toxins right back into your tank via the fish's digestive system.
 

wade1

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
And back to the original post...

I agree, that lettuce can be an occassional snack, just rinse it well first.

Nori and Laver and some other frozen macros are a better alternative.
 

RacinRabit

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have several different tangs that love Romaine lettuce - they won't touch Nori though. Once the lettuce leaf is gone, the fish pick at the "ribs" on the leaf, then play with the lettuce clip. Food and entertainment all in one. :lol:
 

Len

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Yep, go with Romaine. It's got more nutritional value and less hard fibers. Freezing then blanching the leafs lyses the cells and makes it more digestable.
 

Mihai

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Isn't laver the corean nori that is very salty, fried and soaked in sesame oil? How can that be good for the tangs? I agree with unsalted nori though. And believe it or not, I agree with PLB regarding the living seaweeds. I have a hard time finding something that my tang would eat and would not overtake my tank though.

M.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Mihai":1olkdusm said:
Isn't laver the corean nori that is very salty, fried and soaked in sesame oil? How can that be good for the tangs?

Raw unseasoned Laver....
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Laver is the Atlantic counterpart of nori- I have no idea how koreans got ahold of it.
 

WRASSER

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
OK well not only do my tangs eat it, my triggers, dawrfs angles and some wrasse eat it too. I totally agree that it is not the best, it ok, What i want to know is the toxic out the other end and will it be the same as silver sides out the other end? :)
And yes my tangs eat on the silver sides 8O :) :wink:
 

Sponsor Reefs

We're a FREE website, and we exist because of hobbyists like YOU who help us run this community.

Click here to sponsor $10:


Top