• Why not take a moment to introduce yourself to our members?

A

Anonymous

Guest
USM= ultra silent motor or something like that. When I was buying a 75-300 for my first canon. I tried the normal lens, then the USM. I bought the USM. I didn't really think the normal lens was loud, untill I heard the USM.

I think canon started puting the same motor in all thier lenses. I may be wrong.

I checked and B&H has the same lens for $309.

Make Sure you get the USA warranty, not the 'Imported" version. the money you save up front will be spent sending your lens to Taiwan if you ever break it.

B
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Actually, is I recall correctly, I think USM is Ultra Sonic Motor...
But I was being sarcastic...
I can believe thats really the price! I thought those things cost thousands upon thousands of dollars! Its really USM then?! For that price?!
Is that a good newbie lens, would you say? Something thats not too wide for general use, but good enough for some macro and wide angle work? all lightly, addressed, of course! I know you cant have it all!

Well, thanks for the reply Bingo! This place sure is slow for replies these days!
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Ok, Bingo, or somebody; could ya just straight tell me? Im breaking down on this one...

24-85mm... The first number is the focal length, right? The distance between the rear lens element and the sensor?... Then whats the second number?! Zoom or something?! Im lost! *sigh...*
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
It's a zoom lens. 24mm at the widest, 85 at the tallest.

When you look at lenses, you need to know the length of the lens (24-85), and the aperature. I think this one's f3.5 that's the widest the aperature in the lens will open up.

so it's a 24-85mm f3.5 If you do some research on them, http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/control ... o_itemInfo
you find out it's a 67mm filter, and the minimum focus distance is 1.75' or 21 inches. However knowing that is measured at the widest view (24mm) you can se it's not such a good macro lens. if you zoom in, you'll need more distance.

Now, as you get into biger aperature lenses "faster*" lenses, that's where the money comes in. All those cameras at the end zone of a football game are really fast lenses (f1.8, f2.0) They also cost around $2k each. For the pro photographers, its a work tool. For me it's a dream to have one.(* 'faster' because it lets you shoot with faster shutter speed and still expose correctly.)


The (almost) short answer:
It's a good lens, however, IF you've already got the eos system, check around for used lenses. They'll be cheaper. YOu may get two or three lenses for the same amount of money. also, It's about the same lens you get with most camera 'Kits'. My elanIIE came with a 28-80. If you're really looking for a wide angle. Buy just a wide ange. They're under $100 used (most are also good macro lenses.) Same with the extra 5mm zoom. You can get a 75-300 f4 for under $200. If you're looking for ONE lens to do both, it will be okay.

B
 

Len

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
"Faster" lenses are expensive because they're built to stricter tolerances to allow for bigger aperatures. A faster lenses (F2.8 or lower) will usually perform better then a slower lens at the same aperature.

USM (in Nikon, it's AF-S) is a lot quieter, but more importantly, faster. They use USM on some of Canon's upper-end consumer cameras now (though it's not really to the same performance standards that you'd expect of a USM motor).

The 24-85 should be good for general purpose photography. I've never used it so I'm basing it on it s specs only, but people seem to think it's a good affordable lens. It's not going to do true macro; you'll need a macro lens for that. But for everyday shots including WA work, it should be a good performer for the price.
 

Sponsor Reefs

We're a FREE website, and we exist because of hobbyists like YOU who help us run this community.

Click here to sponsor $10:


Top