• Why not take a moment to introduce yourself to our members?

zahner

Senior Member
Location
NYC - 10026
Rating - 100%
11   0   0
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/04/AR2006070400772.html?referrer=emailarticle


Growing Acidity of Oceans May Kill Corals


[SIZE=-1]By Juliet Eilperin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, July 5, 2006; A01
[/SIZE]
The escalating level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is making the world's oceans more acidic, government and independent scientists say. They warn that, by the end of the century, the trend could decimate coral reefs and creatures that underpin the sea's food web.
Although scientists and some politicians have just begun to focus on the question of ocean acidification, they describe it as one of the most pressing environmental threats facing Earth.
"It's just been an absolute time bomb that's gone off both in the scientific community and, ultimately, in our public policymaking," said Rep. Jay Inslee (D-Wash.), who received a two-hour briefing on the subject in May with five other House members. "It's another example of when you put gigatons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, you have these results none of us would have predicted."
Thomas E. Lovejoy, president of the H. John Heinz III Center for Science, Economics and the Environment, has just rewritten the paperback edition of "Climate Change and Biodiversity," his latest book, to highlight the threat of ocean acidification. "It's the single most profound environmental change I've learned about in my entire career," he said last week.
A coalition of federal and university scientists is to issue a report today describing how carbon dioxide emissions are, in the words of a press release from the National Center for Atmospheric Research and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, "dramatically altering ocean chemistry and threatening corals and other marine organisms that secrete skeletal structures."
For decades, scientists have viewed the oceans' absorption of carbon dioxide as an environmental plus, because it mitigates the effects of global warming. But by taking up one-third of the atmosphere's carbon dioxide -- much of which stems from exhaust from automobiles, power plants and other industrial sources -- oceans are transforming their pH level.
The pH level, measured in "units," is a calculation of the balance of a liquid's acidity and its alkalinity. The lower a liquid's pH number, the higher its acidity; the higher the number, the more alkaline it is. The ph level for the world's oceans was stable between 1000 and 1800, but has dropped one-tenth of a unit since the Industrial Revolution, according to Christopher Langdon, a University of Miami marine biology professor.
Scientists expect ocean pH levels to drop by another 0.3 units by 2100, which could seriously damage marine creatures that need calcium carbonate to build their shells and skeletons. Once absorbed in seawater, carbon dioxide forms carbonic acid and lowers ocean pH, making it harder for corals, plankton and tiny marine snails (called pteropods) to form their body parts.
Ken Caldeira, a chemical oceanographer at Stanford University who briefed lawmakers along with NCAR marine ecologist Joan Kleypas, said oceans are more acidic than they have has been for "many millions of years."
"What we're doing in the next decade will affect our oceans for millions of years," Caldeira said. "CO2levels are going up extremely rapidly, and it's overwhelming our marine systems."
Some have questioned global-warming predictions based on computer models, but ocean acidification is less controversial because it involves basic chemistry. "You can duplicate this phenomenon by blowing into a straw in a glass of water and changing the water's pH level," Lovejoy said. "It's basically undeniable."
Hugo A. Lo?iciga, a geography professor at the University of California at Santa Barbara, is one of the few academics to question the phenomenon. A groundwater hydrologist, Lo?iciga published a paper in the May edition of the American Geophysical Union's journal that suggested the oceans may not become so acidic, because enough carbonate material will help restore equilibrium to them.
Lo?iciga wrote that although seawater in certain regions may become more acidic over time, "on a global scale and over the time scales considered (hundreds of years), there would not be accentuated changes in either seawater salinity or acidity from the rising concentration of atmospheric CO2."
Two dozen scientists have written a response questioning this assumption, since it would take thousands of years for such material to reach the oceans from land.
"The paper by Lo?iciga ignores decades of scholarship, presents inappropriate calculations and draws erroneous conclusions that simply do not apply to real ocean," they wrote. They added that, unless carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere stabilize soon, the seas will soon exceed the Environmental Protection Agency's recommended acidity limits.
Scientists have conducted a few ocean acidification experiments in recent years. All have shown that adding carbon dioxide to the water slows corals' growth rate and can dissolve pteropods' shells.
Langdon, who conducted an experiment between 1996 and 2003 in Columbia University's Biosphere 2 lab in Tucson, concluded that corals grew half as fast in aquariums when exposed to the level of carbon dioxide projected to exist by 2050. Coupled with the higher sea temperatures that climate change produces, Langdon said, corals may not survive by the end of the century.
"It's going to be on a global scale and it's also chronic," Langdon said of ocean acidification. "Twenty-four/seven, it's going to be stressing these organisms. . . . These organisms probably don't have the adaptive ability to respond to this new onslaught."
Stanford University marine biologist Robert B. Dunbar has studied the effect of increased carbon dioxide on coral reefs in Israel and Australia's Great Barrier Reef. "What we found in Israel was the community is dissolving," Dunbar said.
Caldeira has mapped out where corals exist today and the pH levels of the water in which they thrive; by the end of the century, no seawater will be as alkaline as where they live now. If carbon dioxide emissions continue at their current levels, he said, "It's say goodbye' to coral reefs."
Although the fate of plankton and marine snails may not seem as compelling as vibrantly colored coral reefs, they are critical to sustaining marine species such as salmon, redfish, mackerel and baleen whales.
"These are groups everyone depends on, and if their numbers go down there are going to be reverberations throughout the food chain," said John Guinotte, a marine biologist at the Marine Conservation Biology Institute. "When I see marine snails' shells dissolving while they're alive, that's spooky to me."
Rep. Rush D. Holt (D-N.J.), a scientist by training, attended the congressional briefing on ocean acidification. He said these developments are "new to me, which was surprising because I usually keep up with things."
"The changes in our climate are severe and urgent even if it weren't for this, but this just adds impact and urgency to the situation," Holt said.
 

jhale

ReefsMagazine!
Location
G.V NYC
Rating - 100%
52   0   0
Caldeira has mapped out where corals exist today and the pH levels of the water in which they thrive; by the end of the century, no seawater will be as alkaline as where they live now. If carbon dioxide emissions continue at their current levels, he said, "It's say goodbye' to coral reefs."
Although the fate of plankton and marine snails may not seem as compelling as vibrantly colored coral reefs, they are critical to sustaining marine species such as salmon, redfish, mackerel and baleen whales.


that f'ing sucks.
not trying to be funny but can huge kalk reactors be made for the oceans?
Were putting the Co2 into the water there should be a way to balance it.
I don't see how carbon dioxide levels are going to go down in time to make a difference.
if we don't do anything about this problem then what does that make us?
 

fritz

OG of this here reef game
Location
Marine Park
Rating - 95.9%
47   2   0
Hmmmm. Aren't the huge Kalk reactors already there? I take issue with most of these articles as I find them to be alarmist and for the most part written by people who flunked history and earth science.

Corals are very old, old animals. They've been on this planet for a very long stretch. They've seen ice, extreme heat, etc. They're not going anywhere. If the equitorial region becomes to hot the coral larvae will begin to attach a bit farther north or south and the reefs will move there. Some of the coral colonies in the reefs we visit are thousands of years old. Our lifetimes are mere days to these animals. There are "reefs" that thrive atop volcanic vents, in the most toxic of oceanic environments there is a GREAT abundance of diverse and colorful life!

I'm too tired to continue but my point is think of all the changes that the Earth has undergone in the last hundred million years. We still have coral and cockroaches. We humans are the ones with the odds stacked against them but for corals and cockroaches, I'm not worried. They may evolve and change they way they look and act but they'll continue on.
 
Last edited:

jhale

ReefsMagazine!
Location
G.V NYC
Rating - 100%
52   0   0
i would not call this alarmist, they are predicting what could happen 50 to 100 years from now. it's our children and grand children that could be living without the reefs, and it has a much larger impact than just the coral dying.
 

fritz

OG of this here reef game
Location
Marine Park
Rating - 95.9%
47   2   0
That's my point though, the coral won't be gone. After re-reading my post this morning it seems that I was quite grumpy and tired when I wrote it last night. I doesn't at all read the way I intended...

The Earth has a great way of balancing itself, too much of this and an animal will come along that consumes it, then another that eats that new animal and so on. The polyped corals most likely have a shared ancestor somewhere along the way. Something caused them to develop so differently. LPS have different requirements then SPS, then mushrooms. These developments are in response to different environments. In one form or another corals will continue as they have for hundreds of millions of years. An ocean with a lower PH and higher temp is laughable compared to what they've seen. My fear is that we humans are NOT so adaptable. We do not have the track record of these animals. We have not seen the harshest this planet has to offer and survived. We haven't been here as long. It's horrible that each generation knows a different planet then the one before it. One with more strip malls, one with beaches that have medical waste, etc. It sucks but hopefully our kids will teach their kids and they'll look back at our generation as "back when people were glutinous, wasteful and oblivious to what they were doing to their environment."
 

Sponsor Reefs

We're a FREE website, and we exist because of hobbyists like YOU who help us run this community.

Click here to sponsor $10:


Top