I have had a heck of a time trying to obtain an a.maculatus. I got tired of driving long distances to shops that told me they had an a.maculatus only to find when I got there that it was a different species of angler.
Eventually I ordered from a very reputable on-line retailer. Their website identified the fish as a. maculatus. The first delivery was a.multiocellatus. They shipped a replacement free of charge. It was a.maculatus. The fish had ingested air and I lost it. I have heard that can be a problem with this fish. I re-ordered and received another a.multiocellatus. They shipped a replacement free of charge and I received an a.hispidus. They then credited me back for the second charge.
End-result: four fish, one correct identification. The retailer is top notch. They only charged me for one fish. I have no gripe about the order but I do want to understand how pervasive this misidentification of species is within the industry. Where does the problem lie? Is it collectors, distributors or wholesalers that are misidentifying the fish or is it at the retail level? Is this just an unusual event? Are anglers/frogfish terribly hard to identify?
Personally, I was able to identify each fish pretty easily using Scott Michael's Marine Fishes pocket guide and his Reef Fishes Vol 1. Differences in fins, esca, and other traits make them seem pretty easy to id to me. The two biggest concerns I have with ordering fish online is first, I can't see what I'm getting and second, the fish is at risk during shipment. I don't mind not being able to see the individual fish as long as I get the right species. But if my experience with this angler is commonplace, then I think it will be difficult to convince many hobbyists to buy fish online. What do you think?
Eventually I ordered from a very reputable on-line retailer. Their website identified the fish as a. maculatus. The first delivery was a.multiocellatus. They shipped a replacement free of charge. It was a.maculatus. The fish had ingested air and I lost it. I have heard that can be a problem with this fish. I re-ordered and received another a.multiocellatus. They shipped a replacement free of charge and I received an a.hispidus. They then credited me back for the second charge.
End-result: four fish, one correct identification. The retailer is top notch. They only charged me for one fish. I have no gripe about the order but I do want to understand how pervasive this misidentification of species is within the industry. Where does the problem lie? Is it collectors, distributors or wholesalers that are misidentifying the fish or is it at the retail level? Is this just an unusual event? Are anglers/frogfish terribly hard to identify?
Personally, I was able to identify each fish pretty easily using Scott Michael's Marine Fishes pocket guide and his Reef Fishes Vol 1. Differences in fins, esca, and other traits make them seem pretty easy to id to me. The two biggest concerns I have with ordering fish online is first, I can't see what I'm getting and second, the fish is at risk during shipment. I don't mind not being able to see the individual fish as long as I get the right species. But if my experience with this angler is commonplace, then I think it will be difficult to convince many hobbyists to buy fish online. What do you think?