If your fuge is big enough, and set up right, than triton method is not needed, as far as for nutrient control.
I?m going on 3 years on a 220, 2 years on a a 150, and one year on another 150 with no water changes needed yet. On the 220 i?m considering triton as a way of replacing trace elements, because i?m Not doing water changes.
Think of triton as two parts. One part is for nutrient control, the other part is keeping trace elements in line, which goes way beyond alk, cal, and mag.
If you have the means to control nutrients, then you use triton?s other method. Because triton?s regular method has added fertilizer in just about all the trace elements as a way of getting macro to grow faster and consume nutrients, which you probably wouldn?t want if you already have enough means of removing nutrients with your set up