Manhattan Reefs  

Welcome to Manhattan Reefs, the premier website for coral reef aquarium owners in the New York City area.

You are not currently logged in to our site so you may not be able to access all of the wonderful content and features that we offer. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.

User Name
Password
   Home Forums Photo Gallery Chat Reef Database User CP Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read About MR


Reply
 
Share LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-26-2007, 08:05 AM
#1
marki24
Zoa Collector
marki24's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 3,342
Reefer Ratings: (72 (99%)
Friends: (24)
marki24 is offline View My Gallery Send a Private Message
The Algaecide Code

A casual surve of phospate remover labels on the market reveals a host of convoluted phrases hinting that the product will hinder algae growth, but not actually stating so in blunt terms. Look out for the following phrases:
"Prevents buildup in your aquarium"
"Removes organic growth"
"Removes excess nutrients from water"
All of these claims hint toward the real reason to use phospate removers: algae control. So why dont the labels just say that the product helps control algae?
The blunt reason why manufactuerers do not make these claims is that under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act any product that claims to kill, remove or prevent algae is considered a pesticide and subject to regulation by the EPA.
The mininum cost to register an algecide with the EPA is roughly $100,000 once all the required data gathering, testing and analysis are done. After that, the product must be registered in all states, adding an annual registration cost of up to $20,000 to the product.
Often, the return on investment does not justify the cost of registering a product as a pesticide with the EPA. This is the reason for all the obfuscation on the labels.
Companies making direct algecidal claims on their labels without registering their products industry remains small enough to avoid attracting much regularory scrunity. But that is not alsways true.
In 2001 and 2002, a prominent aquarium products manufacturer faced heavy fines formt he EPA for making algaecide claims on packaging of UV sterilizers. They eventually settled with the agency by paying more than $200,000.

Just something i found in a fish book article. I figured i would share it with people just found it interesting.
Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2007, 08:15 AM
#2
Deanos
Senior Member
Deanos's Avatar
Moderator: This member is a Moderator. - Issue reason:  
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bronx, NY 10475
Posts: 13,437
Reefer Ratings: (110 (100%)
Friends: (43)
Personally, I don't want an algaecide anyway. There are too many beneficial algae in my tank to kill them all. My tank would crash. What I want products to do is exactly this:

"Prevents buildup in your aquarium" & "Removes excess nutrients from water"
Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2007, 09:14 AM
#3
House of Laughter
never reef alone with MR
House of Laughter's Avatar
Moderator: This member is a Moderator. - Issue reason:  
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ossining, NY
Posts: 12,329
Reefer Ratings: (150 (100%)
Friends: (23)
House of Laughter is online now View My Gallery Send a Private Message
Marki,

Any chance you can share the source (book) in case others decide they may want to read?

LMK

House
__________________
Grow your own . . . .



Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2007, 10:28 AM
#4
marki24
Zoa Collector
marki24's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 3,342
Reefer Ratings: (72 (99%)
Friends: (24)
marki24 is offline View My Gallery Send a Private Message
I believe it was in the "Freshwater and Marine Aquarium" magazine February 2008 issue, which is the newest one in the stand.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:27 AM.