
solbby said:I notice "burn" by a browning of the the coral (similar to how we humans tan under the sun), and lack of colorful growth tips. If you "burn" them enough they will begin to bleach. Remember, many other things will also create this phenotype in SPS, so you need to have a competely healthy tank to begin with to even narrow down this observation.
You could do that or.....provide less light, or feed more. I was giving 6 hours light without feeding much = bad color. I upped the feeding schedule and more growth/color. I guess I could have also feed less but decreased the light period to get the same effect. I'm sure there is a formula for what I am describing,DRZL said:How about putting some SPF on my SPS![]()
DRZL said:what? :bunnies:
Kris,
Remember that SPS will grow (and PE) w/ higher than normal n03 present, but color will be less liely to show, has your n03 changed since I saw u last? (aka test)..lol
nanoreefer22 said:It better have, the tank got almost a 100% water change through treatments. PE(Polyp extension?)? No test yet, maybe I could mail you a water sample :teeth:. But we'll see what another week holds for the tank.
Oddly enough polyp extension is really good, you can be the judge of that if you stop by. I'd take a ride though.DRZL said:PE=polyp extension:thrash:
I was actually thinking of heading over to Anthony at reef exotics to check out that 450G this wknd, would save u shipping Mr. el cheapo..lol:shhh:
Don't agree with the sunburn analogy, and this sounds too much like getting energy for free. A few of us (MCsaxmaster, ATJ) argued with Bomber and his minionssolbby said:See what is really cool about this fact is that:
1. SPS can get a "sun burn".
2. That your taking more advantage of the dark period of photosynthesis, i.e. when sugars are being made most.
3. Bombertrooper
once suggested that SPS only needs a short photoperiod to acquire the most energy from the light aspect of photosynthesis (photosynthesis actually requires both a light period and a dark period to function) and that any more above a certain point is unnessesary (this actually fits with all the biochemistry of plant metabolism that I have studied). In fact too much light is detrimental. An analogy is, if you were to spend 10 hours in the sun in Miami with out protection, how would you feel?
4. Based on my studies in nitrate and N cycles, SPS actually are able to absorb many nutrients from the water column and succesfully convert them to working energy (growth = color).
Can you briefly (I know I said briefly :lolsolbby said:SPS has a max limit in light needed for successful photosynthesis, anything over is just going to create a "burn". Once the optimum is reached, it is then up to the dark cycle of photosynthesis to use the light energy acquired to create sugars nessesary for growth.
My "burn" analogy is extremely simplistic. I would define the response of SPS to increased light as a "stress response", in that the SPS in question is put into a situation where it has little or no time to biologically adapt with the present state that it is in (it needs more proteins and different proteins than it presently has to respond, and doesn't have enough energy or time to make them). In then responds by illiciting defense mechanisms.kimoyo said:Don't agree with the sunburn analogy, and this sounds too much like getting energy for free. A few of us (MCsaxmaster, ATJ) argued with Bomber and his minions)) about this last year in this thread, Run a short halide photoperiod....
Here's another good thread also, So our halides are giving our corals much more light than the sun!.
And a good introduction, Lets talk about ~Lighting~.
I would like to understand why pigments darken when exposed to low light levels and lighten when exposed to high light levels (or increase/decrease population levels).
Can you briefly (I know I said briefly :lolexplain photosynthesis and its dark cycle.
