Manhattan Reefs

Welcome to Manhattan Reefs, the premier website for coral reef aquarium owners in the New York City area.

You are not currently logged in to our site so you may not be able to access all of the wonderful content and features that we offer. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.

User Name
Password
   Home Forums Photo Gallery Chat Reef Database User CP Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Tools


Reply
 
Share LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-10-2010, 04:28 PM
#1
Member
Tarazed's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: West Islip
Posts: 91
Reefer Ratings: (1 (100%)
Friends: (2)
Tarazed is offline View My Gallery Send a Private Message
Mid-Life Crisis Tank ;)

I'm presently running a 120 gallon softie reef and had to have a Blue Face angel a few weeks ago. So now the hunt begins for a bigger home for the new fish. Since my 40th is a few weeks away and I've begun plotting I'm going to call this my Mid-Life Crisis upgrade.

I built a mock 210 gallon tank out of 2x3 to see if I will fit down the stairs and into my basement. Its a real tight squeeze, but, it will make it. It looks like a 220 Perfecto should also make it, but, thats as big as it gets.

I've done a little homework on the two brands and it appears that the perfecto would have beveled edges (I confirmed via email after seeing a tank). However, it looks like the Perfecto only comes with the corner overflows and they appear to take up more tank space. My 120 is an AGA RR and I have been happy with the tank. Does anyone have any preference in RR 210 or 220 tanks. Perfecto or AGA?

I will also be temporarily using the 4' 6 bulb T5s I have and will probably stay with T5s for a while. I am considering using 2 40 gallon breeders as a sump/fuge, with 2 internal return pumps and a connecting piece of pipe between. I will have one of the sumps extend beyond the end of the tank to allow for taller protein skimmers and easier access. As of now I'm going to keep running a 180 Euroreef and could temporarily add a Remora Pro.

I have all the extra sand I'll need and will probably use the rock I have now ~130 pounds. I want an open aquascape. I hate the wall of rock look. Plus the Blue Face likes caves.

Any thoughts?
Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 05:59 PM
#2
www.saltwatercritters.com
House of Laughter's Avatar
Vendor: Vendor - Issue reason:  
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ossining, NY
Posts: 11,851
Reefer Ratings: (142 (100%)
Friends: (68)
House of Laughter is offline View My Gallery Send a Private Message
Images: 91
sump/fuge won't be large enough for a 220 IMO.

130lbs of rock will definitely give it the fish only look, but that might be a nice look if pillared in the center or off to the side with some corals on it.

skimmer is undersized even if you add a remora. watr volume like that required a more powerful skimmer IMO

Sounds like a fun project

House
__________________
House of Fish
(845) 610-3644

On the web - www.saltwatercritters.com


Serving all your saltwater critter and reef needs



Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 06:24 PM
#3
Senior Member
mr_X's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: paoli, pa
Posts: 367
Reefer Ratings: (0 (0%)
Friends: (1)
mr_X is offline View My Gallery Send a Private Message
if you are considering buying your "last" tank, i would think on the size more. these 210's and 240's are very deep top to bottom. not good for a reef IMO/E.
i would suggest getting a tank made that is alot shallower, and deeper front to back. definitely not deeper top to bottom than 25". i would say less than that even.
remember, the deeper it is, the stronger light you will need to penetrate all that water, and the harder it will be to reach the bottom.

i would go with something 36" front to back. i had a 30" front to back tank recently, and i wished i would have made it 36". it sounds like alot, but you'll love it once you own it.

i would take my time and purchase the right equipment for it as well.
Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 07:03 PM
#4
Member
Tarazed's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: West Islip
Posts: 91
Reefer Ratings: (1 (100%)
Friends: (2)
Tarazed is offline View My Gallery Send a Private Message
Mr x- I don't think I can get anything larger down the stairs. I'm also prohibited by cost. I was considering a 180 gallon, but like the look of the 210/220 height. A 180 is a great tank though. This may be my last tank in the basement, but one never knows.

House- I will upgrade the skimmer, but because of $ I have to take it one step at a time. What would you suggest for a sump? I have a 125 gallon cichlid tank I could use, but I think its too tall to use under the stand I'll build. I'm using a 40 breeder with my 120 and its perfect. I thought I could just add a second. and move some of the partitions.
Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 07:11 PM
#5
The Yutz
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 1,547
Reefer Ratings: (28 (100%)
Friends: (25)
jrobbins is offline View My Gallery Send a Private Message
Images: 89
I would wait a bit until you can afford all the equipment you are going to need before pulling the trigger on a tank that big. also keep in mind that the operating costs of a tank that large will be significantly more than the 120. Everything from the heaters, to the lights, to the salt/carbon/gfo will cost a bunch more. if the money is tight right now it really might make sense to wait.

think of it like a yacht. most people can probably afford to buy the damn thing, but the upkeep is what kills ya...
Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 08:53 PM
#6
Member
Tarazed's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: West Islip
Posts: 91
Reefer Ratings: (1 (100%)
Friends: (2)
Tarazed is offline View My Gallery Send a Private Message
I anticipate that the costs of salt and media will double. As will electricity to heat the water etc. My thought was that the only initial change will be the volume of water, not bioload, I thought I would be safe with my present equipment for a few months, no?

By summer, I'll upgrade the lights and then the skimmer. By not increasing the bioload and only increasing the volume of water I though I'd be ok. I only plan to keep softies and larger fish. It will never become an sps tank. Too much for my wallet and not my interest. I'm somewhere between a mixed reef and a FOWLR. If I ever wanted to go sps the 120 would best fit the bill. I am getting out of another hobby so that will help with the cost and I've had tanks since 1995 so I know I'm in for the long haul.

I appreciate the analogy with the boat as I have one and that is a true money pit, although its no yacht. Initially I was going to get a 180 but I think the 210/220 is worth the extra effort am I mistaken?

I want a 6' tank, but i'm limited by the door width at the top of the basement stairs, its less than 30". Considering cost, space and ease of installation my best bets are a 180 or a 210. The 180 maybe my answer but I can't see the extra 30 gallons of water making a huge difference in expense or equipment. I'm not going to need intense lighting and thats the one area that the two tanks will differ.

Thanks for all the feedback!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2010, 04:56 PM
#7
Member
Tarazed's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: West Islip
Posts: 91
Reefer Ratings: (1 (100%)
Friends: (2)
Tarazed is offline View My Gallery Send a Private Message
Update

I've made a lot of progress in the past few weeks/months. Here are some pics. I apologize as the pictures were taken with a phone because we STILL can't find our camera.

I made a model of the tank to make sure it would fit. In true "geeknees" I used the pythagorean theorem to figure out the maximum height required to stand and "drop" the tank into position. I also needed to cut several joists with a sawsall to get the height necessary. This was the largest tank I could fit.



Here are some pictures after I took the wall down in the basement below the stairs.







Here is the beginning of the stand. Totally over-kill 2- 2"x6" sandwiched with 1/2 plywood. 4"x4"s were used for the legs.





Skipped a few steps here but the girls had to go for a "swim"







Adding some RO water and Marco Rock.






And pictures of things "almost" done.









Getting closer:

Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2010, 05:32 PM
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: brooklyn
Posts: 1,150
Reefer Ratings: (22 (100%)
Friends: (3)
juiceguy is offline View My Gallery Send a Private Message
Donation Level 4 
Images: 247
looks good......don't you just love the look of a new tank
Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2010, 08:20 PM
#9
Member
Tarazed's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: West Islip
Posts: 91
Reefer Ratings: (1 (100%)
Friends: (2)
Tarazed is offline View My Gallery Send a Private Message
Update Continued

I think I failed to mention, its a 220 Perfecto. I also didn't wait for the summer to upgrade the lights and skimmer. I picked up used 250 metal halides (x3) and a bought a new SWC 300A (MSX) with an askoll 1500 on it. I also picked up 2 x 3' VHO Super Actinics. I may jump to 6' bulbs, but for now I'm just looking for a dusk/dawn effect. I haven't added any live stock to the tank since the 2-10-10 transfer from the 120, not even a snail. No measurable cycle, except for 5-10 ppm of nitrate, which I never had in the original 120. I would like the nitrates to return to 0 before adding anything. All other values are good, phosphate immeasurable, pH 8.2, dKH 9, Ca 420, 1.026, Mg 1360 etc





Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2010, 08:42 PM
Wes
Senior Member
Wes's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,369
Reefer Ratings: (6 (100%)
Friends: (4)
Wes is offline View My Gallery Send a Private Message
Images: 1
lookin' good!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:09 PM.