Osram manufacturers the 20,000K Radium bulbs. They're designed for HQI use, but can be operated with standard ballasts (with much decreased output). Ushio manufacturers the 10,000K bulb. Same spew about the hqi/standard ballst for these bulbs.
I've used 20,000K bulbs before on standard mag ballasts, following Steve Tyree's lead back in 1996. I didn't like the results of the bulbs; they were very dim to the eye, and modern testing has shown that they are pretty dismal in PAR and lumen value when used with mag ballasts. The Radiums were VERY blue, and didn't render colors accurately; everything either looked green, or bluish. They also didn't flourensce the corals like true actinics do (I believe they center their spectral output at 450nm, vs 420nm of actinics). My opinion of the bulbs operated under standard magnetic ballasts? Very poor, and not recommended.
It's a different story (in regards to PAR and spectral output) when operated with a HQI ballast, and I have no experience there. Hopefully someone here does. Sanjay has done a couple of of the bulb comparative evaluations using different ballasts:
www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/s/b/sbj4/aquarium/ballast%20comparison/ballast-comparison.html
My opinion is that Iwaski or Ushios, married with true actinics (I like VHO's myself) produce the most aesthetic results, and yields the best growth and pigmentation.
The UBB code for URL is driving me nuts!
[ October 03, 2001: Message edited by: Leonard ]