• Why not take a moment to introduce yourself to our members?

INNOVATOR

Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Pc's are brighter, last longer (at least twice as long), and therefore more energy efficient. Heat output of either is generally minimal, though I'd still add a fan. People seem to prefer vho's based on aesthetics, the actinic flourescent output, but overall Pc's are simply the best technology out there, unless you're going with a tank above 24" height where halides might be needed-reef.
 

25gator

Active Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
the bulbs on my icecap 110w vho and 160w vho are about 15-20d. cooler than my csl 32w pc on the mini reef. the ballast on the pc is cooler by about 10d. hope this helps!
i'm not overly impressed with either light but the pc bulb almost hurts to hold (i'm a welder thick skin) so i like the vho's.
 

xKEIGOx

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
and VHO generate more UV radiation then PL does! I prefer PL also! The only lights that can beat PL to me is MH in an 24inches deep tank. if I have an 18", I'll go for PL :oops:
 

Mouse

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
You get more of a Bioluminecent Glow from your corals when using VHO tubes. But the PC's do last longer.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I think the best thing about the VHOs is that they come in longer lengths. The PCs would be better if they made them 46"-48".
 

Sponsor Reefs

We're a FREE website, and we exist because of hobbyists like YOU who help us run this community.

Click here to sponsor $10:


Top