• Why not take a moment to introduce yourself to our members?

A

Anonymous

Guest
I mentioned in another post about my efforts to erradicate a hair algae problem that the problem was most likely the result of a failure of my RO membrane that went undetected for several months. After further investigation, I have some additional thoughts as to what happened and how the problem might be avoided. I hope this is of help to anyone setting up a similar RO/DI system.

My RO/DI system configuration:

I have a Kent Maxxima RO/DI unit that has been upgraded with a 75 gpd membrane and connected to a 10 gal bladder tank and a drinking water kit. Water is fed to my RO membrane after passing through micron and carbon pre-filters. The output from the RO membrane is split into three separate lines, the first being connected to a drinking water faucet, the second to the bladder tank, and the third to a pair of DI cartridges. As I will explain below, the third line is what I use to top-off my tank.

In this configuration, the RO unit will produce water whenever water is drawn off through either the drinking water faucet or the tank top-off line outlets. More specifically, when ever water is drawn off through either of these outlets, the water is initailly supplied by the processed water in the bladder tank. As the amount (and pressure) of water in the bladder tank decreases, the RO unit begins to process water and continues until the outlets have been closed AND the bladder tank has been re-filled.

As far as I know, the above description is a typical configuration for a RO system with a bladder tank and drinking water kit.

My top-off arrangement:

My RO/DI system is located on the opposite side of the room from my reef tank. I therefore do not have the RO/DI system permanently connected to my tank. When ever I need to top-off my tank, I connect a 1/4" line between my sump and the top-off outlet of the RO/DI system, and open a valve to allow water to flow from the bladder tank/RO membrane, through my DI cartridges, and to my sump. A Kent float valve in my sump prevents me from over-filling my tank.

I usually hook up my tank before I go to bed, and let my tank top-off over night.

The problems with my arrangement:

I have recently learned that RO membranes allow a small quantity of relatively un-pure water to pass through the membrane each time the membrane begins to process water. Obviously, the more times that the RO system starts up, the greater the quantity of impurities (ie, total dissolved solids) that will to pass through the system. I have seen this when testing my RO output immediately after initial water processing by the membrane. I have also been told that increasing the number of time the RO membrane kicks in shortens the life of the membrane.

Now in my system, most of the impurities will be captured by the DI units. The DI units will, however, become exhausted much more quickly. This is only aggravated by the manner in which I top off my tank.

My tank and sump hold around 400 gallons, net. Depending on the season, I evaporate 3-6 gallons per day. When I hook my sump up to the RO/DI system at night, the water that has evaporated durig the day is quickly replaced by the water stored in my bladder tank. Not too quickly, however, since I use a flow restricter valve to reduce the rate of flow (to increase contact time) through the DI cartridges. In any event, the sump is usually topped-off within an hour or two.

Now for the problem. Because I leave my sump connected to the RO/DI system throughout the night, the RO/DI system acts like an automatic top-off system and replaces water as it evaporates during the night. This is fine until the bladder tank has been re-filled (probably within 2-3 hours). After that, the RO membrane will repeatedly kick in to produce small quantities of water as it evaporates from my tank. As I explained above, this water will likely have very high TDS and will quickly exhaust my DI cartridges.

My hair algae outbreak appears to be a direct result of this problem. Hair algae first became a problem earlier this year, and seemed to coincide with a three week trip I had taken in South America. At that time, I had someone come-in and check on the tank and feed my fish every 2-3 days. But to avoid having my fish-sitter deal with topping-off the tank, I left my RO/DI system connected to the tank 24/7. When I returned from my trip, the tank had some serious algae problems. At the time, I figured it was the result of over-feeding. But now, I believe that because the RO membrane would repeatedly kick-in to produce small amounts of top-off water as the water evaporated from my tank, the level and quantity of TDS that was being allowed to pass through the system quickly overwelmed by DI cartridges and corrupted by RO membrane. As I mentioned above, it took me sometime to figure out that there was a problem with my RO/DI system, and even longer to figure out what the problem is.

Possible solutions:

As an inital step, I plan to add a vavle to the output from my RO membrane so that I can isolate the RO membrane from the water stored in the baldder tank and the two outlets (the drinking water faucet and the top-off output for my tank). I will close this valve before connecting my sump to the RO/DI system. Thus, only the water in my bladder tank will be used to top-off my tank, and I can leave the tank connected throughout the night. In the morning, after disconnecting the tank from my RO/DI system, and I will then open the valve to allow RO membrane to process water continuously until the bladder tank has been re-filled. The result will be that the RO membrane will start-up production of water only once per day, as opposed to who know how many times per day it had been forced to start-up.

The only other time the RO membrane might kick in is if, after the bladder tank has been re-filled, water is drawn off the system through the drinking water faucet. But this should not be significant since I don't use that water for much other than making coffee.

One problem that I still need to resolve is what I should do when out of town. My 10 gallon bladder tank is not large enough to store more than 1-2 days worth of water. One possible solution is a water level sensor that will open a valve connected to my top-off water supply line when the water drops in my sump 2-3 gallons, and shuts off after 2-3 gallons have been added to the sump. I am aware of these types of sensors connected to top-off pumps, but not to valves that can regulate flow from a pressurized bladder tank.

I would gladly welcome any and all comments, thoughts or suggestions on any of the above.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
I feel your problem can be solved with a solenoid that control the input to the RO. There are a few solenoids relative cheap (~$10) that work with a 12VAC and have a Jaco connector. Basically, you put the 12VAC power supply on a regular timer (Intermatics, for example) to turn the solenoid on for, say, 12 hours a day between 5am to 5 pm. So your RO only turn on between that time period, and the membrane creep problem is solved. PM me if you want to know where to get the solenoid.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
David Magen":2cqhhkkq said:
I feel your problem can be solved with a solenoid that control the input to the RO. There are a few solenoids relative cheap (~$10) that work with a 12VAC and have a Jaco connector. Basically, you put the 12VAC power supply on a regular timer (Intermatics, for example) to turn the solenoid on for, say, 12 hours a day between 5am to 5 pm. So your RO only turn on between that time period, and the membrane creep problem is solved. PM me if you want to know where to get the solenoid.

Yes, that does sound like a possible solution. I sent you a PM asking for details on the solenoid. Thanks
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Incidently, I tested my theory about RO membrane "creep" last night. In particular, I confirmed that the solenoid that shuts off the supply of tap water to my RO system when my bladder tank is full, allows the tap water to resume flowing to the RO system the instant that water is drawn off of the bladder tank.

As a result, and assuming my Kent float valve allows top-off water to enter my sump whenever the water level in my sump drops by say 1 pint (a complete guess), and assuming that my tank evaporates 5 gallons per day, my RO membrane will start and stop processing water a minimum of 40 times per day (8 pints x 5 gallons).

By the way, I have learned that Aquatic Reef systems (who supplied me with most of my RO/DI system) sells an electronic water level sensing system having high and low activation points and which controls an electronic water valve.
 

bashcraft

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
While everything you're saying about an RO releasing water with high tds levels is true, I find it hard to believe that this is the only reason for your algae problem. A lot of people have their top off system designed like yours, without any problems.

You may want to rethink the over feeding theory.

Bob
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Good point. Most of the time, RO creep just kills of the DI prematurely without any noticeable effect on the reef tank.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
bashcraft":22z164k7 said:
While everything you're saying about an RO releasing water with high tds levels is true, I find it hard to believe that this is the only reason for your algae problem. A lot of people have their top off system designed like yours, without any problems.

You may want to rethink the over feeding theory.

Bob

Perhaps you are correct. Nevertheless, and as I explained in detail in my other post directed to my hair algae outbreak, the manner in which my RO/DI and top-off system is configured is the most reasonable explanation, particularly since I have taken just about every other corrective action (reduced feeding, increased skimming, reduced lighting, etc.) possible. In any event, and maybe I did not explain this with enough detail, I believe that the excessive cycling of my RO membrane led to a premature failure in my last membrane (within a year), and premature failure of my DI cartridges, both of which were unsuspected and undetected for several months.

In addition, although you are probably correct that others may have the same set-up, they may not have the amount of evaporation that I have, and therefore would not observe the same problems that I have experienced with my system. But that is why I posted this information - to determine whether my experiences are unique and my theories are correct.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
David Magen":2937mfbe said:
Good point. Most of the time, RO creep just kills of the DI prematurely without any noticeable effect on the reef tank.

Exactly, sort of. I agree that you would have no noticeable effect on the reef IF you were aware of the prematurely corrupted DI. I posted this info so that others could at least evaluate the potential problem and make an educated decision as to how they might avoid this problem. In any event, I would rather reconfigure my RO/DI system instead of replacing my DI cartridges ever month.
 

ShagManOrg

Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
While I agree that RO creep happens, I don't worry about it, because my DI catches anything that the RO misses for the most part, and my DI is changed out, as a kit, when I change out my sediment and carbon filters (every 9 months to a year). If you guys are running RO/DI, and aren't trying to make the DI last for multiple years, don't sweat it.

Again, just to recap (my post sounds rude), I'm not saying this isn't a problem, but those of you who change your DI with your other components (like me) probably won't ever see the symptoms.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
ShagManOrg":314etwi1 said:
While I agree that RO creep happens, I don't worry about it, because my DI catches anything that the RO misses for the most part, and my DI is changed out, as a kit, when I change out my sediment and carbon filters (every 9 months to a year). If you guys are running RO/DI, and aren't trying to make the DI last for multiple years, don't sweat it.

Again, just to recap (my post sounds rude), I'm not saying this isn't a problem, but those of you who change your DI with your other components (like me) probably won't ever see the symptoms.

Not rude at all. :) And I agree with you that all the cartridges should be switched out together and on a regular basis. But 9 months way be way to long for many depending on how much water they process.

At the time I first noticed the problem in my tank, my cartridges were only 3-4 months old. In addition, the DI cartridge did not exhibit any color change indicating that it had been exhausted. But the lack of color change was a result of a completely different problem with the way my system was configured. As I explained in the first post above, I typically topped-off my tank using the water stored in the bladder tank. Because this water is under pressure, the water was pushed through the DI cartridge at a fairly high flow rate (in my set-up, the only water passing through the DI is for tank top-off). This apparently caused the water to channel through the DI, thereby preventing any impurities from being removed.

After discovering this problem, I did three things: 1) I added a flow restrictor valve to the water line just before the DI unit to slow the rate of flow; 2) I added a second DI unit; and 3) I bought a TDS meter. It wasn't until after I bought the TDS meter that I discovered that my 9 month old 100 gpd membrane had failed. Since then, I try to test all aspects of the RO/DI system every 1-2 weeks. And what I have found is that water with high TDS still seems to be getting into my tank in spite of the fact that whenever I test my RO/DI system, I typically get <2 ppm TDS. As a consequence, I have been looking for other explanations and "membrane creep" is the best I have come-up with.

But again,
 

Osama

Advanced Reefer
Location
Palatine IL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I stopped my system from continuously supplementing directly my sump for a totally different reason. That is it sometimes kept discharging waste water & the solenoid valve did not fully shut off the system. I am glad I did based on the above...
In the diagram refereed to by SoopyDog http://www.spectrapure.com/huds/LLC.pdf
It shows a flow restrictor on the waste line I do not have such a restrictor on my system. Is a flow restrictor beneficial there.
Thanks for the info Mike and thanks for sharing this potential problem with us. I purchased a TDS only 6 months ago and now I rely on it before I replace my cartriges... Very useful for 29 bucks.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
RO system probably came with a flow restrictor on the waste line. It may be nothing more than a small plug-like device with an opening through the center that fits inside the 1/4" waste line tubing where it connects to the RO membrane unit. I replaced mine with an adjustable flow restrictor so that I could alter the ratio of RO product water to RO waste water. Optimizing the ratio will increase the rejection rate and improve the purity of the RO output. I use a ratio of ~1:3.75 for my 75 gpd membrane. Other membranes may require a different ratio.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Some RO pressure vessle have the restrictor build-in on the brine outlet, so you may not see it.

The 1:4 ratio is pretty much universal for household RO unit. For commerical pump-operated (high pressure, high efficient) unit, the ratio is lower, something like 1:1.5 to 1:3.
 

Unresistible Blue

Experienced Reefer
Location
OH
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
osama":1qqiej8n said:
It shows a flow restrictor on the waste line I do not have such a restrictor on my system. Is a flow restrictor beneficial there.

Osama - all RO units like those used in our hobby have a flow restrictor in the waste line. Without it all the water coming into the membrane housing would go out the waste line, and the would be no production of permeate (purified water).

Blue
 

Sponsor Reefs

We're a FREE website, and we exist because of hobbyists like YOU who help us run this community.

Click here to sponsor $10:


Top