dgasmd":7r6tkfwi said:
Wishfull thinking. Pollution from land into the FL waters go pretty far out. You'd be surprised. The first 2 lines of the above quote is what they say, I don't know how much weight I 'd put into that. Anyway, this is one man's opinion. I wish you the best of luck.
This sounds a lot like post-decision justification. Not that Pacific "live" rock isn't a perfectly good foundation for an SPS garden, but these stories about how bad aquacultured live rock is don't do anyone any good except for sellers of Pacific live rock. The worst I've heard from twelve people who've actually used aquacultured live rock for more than a few months (including myself with purchases of both kinds of rock) is that:
1) The aquacultured rock is more dense than Pacific rock, anywhere from 1.5x to 2x the density of various kinds of Pacfic rock (which may be a good thing or a bad thing depending on individual aquarist's goals).
2) The rock is so alive that it is difficult to locate good places for coral frag mounts.
3) There most definitely are malicious hitchikers, including gorilla crabs and mantis shrimp.
4) Die-off continues for longer than Pacific rock, though this appears to be limited to the mussels, clams, and the occasional sponge slowly starving in the unfriendly conditions. Since it's the mussels and clams that make it more difficult to locate coral frags, (2) tends to work itself out in the first year.
Positive aspects consistently mentioned include:
1) "instant" tank cycles. Tiny diatom and algae blooms that are barely noticed if at all. I dose silica and I still haven't seen a true bloom like other people describe. My sand occasionally gets a reddish "blush", but that's gone by the next morning...
2) Incredibly rich variety of life. The rock and all of the various hitchikers makes for a very attractive and interesting tank while the tank is maturing with just the rock present.
3) Apparent long term stability with very few of the common problems mentioned by aquarists on various message boards and newsgroups. In fact, no unexplained persistent blooms at all.
Your description of pollution laden rocks causing untold grief for the aquarists who buy them just doesn't match up with anything I've heard from people who've actually bought and used the rock for any length of time. In fact, it sounds like spoiling.
If you've got a negative first hand account of using the rock or know someone willing to post a negative first hand account, I'd love to read about it. But your claim that that's "what they say" just doesn't hold any water. So to speak
Regards,
Ross