A
Anonymous
Guest
Why not an underflow?
It seems to me that people are concerned about having enough flow in their tank to keep all deitrus suspended so that it can go down the overflow to the sump to get skimmed. Why not have the slots in the overflow at the bottom of the tank? Then all the stuff that normally collects in the bottom of your tank would be sucked into the "underflow" and go to the sump. Then there would be no need to constantly clean the sediment in the display tank.
Is there a reason I am not thinking of that this would be bad?
Besides the plumbing part about the tank draining all the way to the bottom when the power goes off. I think I have that one solved....
It seems to me that people are concerned about having enough flow in their tank to keep all deitrus suspended so that it can go down the overflow to the sump to get skimmed. Why not have the slots in the overflow at the bottom of the tank? Then all the stuff that normally collects in the bottom of your tank would be sucked into the "underflow" and go to the sump. Then there would be no need to constantly clean the sediment in the display tank.
Is there a reason I am not thinking of that this would be bad?
Besides the plumbing part about the tank draining all the way to the bottom when the power goes off. I think I have that one solved....