JimM":33viecrg said:
JohnHenry":33viecrg said:
I don't quarantine anything, and have not had any infectious disasters.
I think if you're careful with what you buy, and are willing to take some risk, then it is not as necessary as many would have you believe.
Again, you're saying "I haven't worn a seatbelt for a year, and I'm still alive. Therefore seatbelts are not very necessary" A rather narrowminded approach methinks.
Thank you.
Let me try to explain my point using your own analogy.
1st, I refute your conclusion that my statement's logic is equal to "I haven't worn a seatbelt for a year, and I'm still alive. Therefore seatbelts are not very necessary".
My logic, in your terms, is that:
-not all car trips are equal.
-not all drivers are equal.
-not all roads are equal.
Let us imagine a man who lives in the country. He only drives to the local store and to his neighbor's house. He's been driving for fifty years. He drives without a seatbelt. And he's neversomuch as broken a fingernail. These people do exist.
For this guy, yes, I'd be willing to say 'seatbelts are not necessary.'
Now imagine that this guy lives by the ocean and keeps marine fish. He has a large stable tank, gets his fish from LFSs who get them straight from the ocean. The LFS always QTs and watches for disease. He knows his tank and the environment from which his livestock is bought.
I'd say this guy can continue doing just fine without the QT.
Any other approach, I thinks, would be narrowminded.
That said, my 1st response to this thread was just that, a response to the OP's question. It was not meant to be advice, and not meant to be driven recklessly.