stallen":1j2ulgb4 said:In this article (Common mistakes...):
http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2005/12/tips/view
Someone mentions that an external over-flow is a common mistake. Any reason why an external over-flow would be a problem?
I always called those hang-on overflows.Thales":1tnwgsdq said:A traditional external overflow uses a siphon to pull water up and over the lip of the tank instead of through the wall of the tank. The problem with this is the siphon can break, and you have, well, a problem.
sfsuphysics":3krtu3rf said:Well hell if you're talking an external overflow without any siphons then I'm all for it! Much nicer IMO as it opens up so much space inside the tank. I did this with my 6 foot long acrylic tank, I cut a series of long slats along almost the entire length of the tank, and "glued" (weldon) an over flow that was a little over 5 feet long..... and I did this with water still in tank (yeah I'm stupid/crazy).
I too thought as Thales did with siphons, of course typically they call those HOB (hang on the back) overflows, but whenever a new poster posts messages probably assumed that's what they're talking about when they say overflows.
Yeah, I call those external overflows.stallen":2fja5g5e said:sfsuphysics":2fja5g5e said:Well hell if you're talking an external overflow without any siphons then I'm all for it! Much nicer IMO as it opens up so much space inside the tank. I did this with my 6 foot long acrylic tank, I cut a series of long slats along almost the entire length of the tank, and "glued" (weldon) an over flow that was a little over 5 feet long..... and I did this with water still in tank (yeah I'm stupid/crazy).
I too thought as Thales did with siphons, of course typically they call those HOB (hang on the back) overflows, but whenever a new poster posts messages probably assumed that's what they're talking about when they say overflows.
Yeah, I'm not a total newb. But I guess I am lacking the proper terminology for this type of over-flow. It's definitely a "custom cut tank with a permanently attached over-flow box without the use of a siphon" 8O I dunno how to boil that down to a couple words :lol: :?:
sfsuphysics":345510e0 said:Thats a nice job you got there, I'm not completely convinced that silicone has a strong enough bond to hold any sort of pressure, but of course glass tanks prove me wrong on that one.. so who knows
Any future tank I might have will have that type of overflow, no iffs and or buts.. unless of course it's a 4 side viewable..![]()
stallen":2phz4sbj said:sfsuphysics":2phz4sbj said:Thats a nice job you got there, I'm not completely convinced that silicone has a strong enough bond to hold any sort of pressure, but of course glass tanks prove me wrong on that one.. so who knows
Any future tank I might have will have that type of overflow, no iffs and or buts.. unless of course it's a 4 side viewable..![]()
Like I said in my second post (with the pictures). It's not my tank. It's a guy on the nano-reef forum that goes by the ID "ninjafish". Here is the link is you are interested: http://www.nano-reef.com/forums/index.p ... pic=101490 I just want to give him the credit. I am just a fan of this and several other tanks that he has done.
Back on topic... Yeah, the glass attached with silicone seems to be the only potential weakness in the plan. I've seem this same type of over flow done with an acrylic tank and acrylic overflow which is probably a stronger bond, but I am most interested in starphire glass.
By the time I am ready to build my tank (probably in a couple years when I'm done with grad school), I will be able to ask several people utilizing this method how it is holding up.
8)Matt_Wandell":2usj3dal said:I should have a tank worthy of taking pictures of sometime in the next few months.![]()