• Why not take a moment to introduce yourself to our members?

trevbo44

Active Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Wow, Vitz. You would think I was taking the money from your account to buy my livestock. I would rather receive responses from those who have checked their personality issues at the login page.
I have been getting the top-off water from another pal who is helping with the upkeep on the tank (the tank is at a school where we both work). The filter he uses is simply called a tap water filter. Fosters and Smith has it as a best seller but perhaps, as I am finding, it is not cutting the mustard.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Vitz's POV (though bluntly put) is one that most people who have been in the hobby for years can understand, especially on these reefboards. It comes from reading/seeing/interacting with tons of people who don't educate themselves about the 'whys' of keeping these creatures alive and the sheer waste of living things due to the attitude that these are replaceable ornaments. It's quite irritating for someone to ask a question of us, we take the time to write out a good answer and they then proceed to totally disregard it. Not that I am putting you in that class BTW, just explaining the level of frustration. Some of these animals, while not endangered are still under pressure due to the continual hobby market for them (due in part to people who just replace the dead animals from their tanks with more taken from the sea instead of learning why they died and fixing the problem). Your comment about "taking money from your wallet to buy livestock" is quite correct. It's your money, spend it how you want but you might pause a moment and do an exercise in creative thinking. Imagine a tank full of puppies rather than fish...would you be so quick to throw another cocker spaniel in if the last one died without learning more about how keep them alive? To those of us who take these things seriously, proposing to add more fish before you fully figure out what's happening is just like putting another puppy in the tank to possibly die. :lol: don't even get me started on the "Finding Nemo" craze and how many posts on dying clownfish due to a lack of knowledge were answered on the internet. The reason we have this board is to extend knowledge, and hopefully to ease people past the learning curve that all of us went through. So, people can either take the time to learn how things how work and more importantly why they work, or they can keep loosing livestock, wasting living resources and cold hard cash.

Vitz is correct, attitude notwithstanding, there really isn't a reason for allowing the SG to swing that much and it is generally accepted that the range should be closer to 1.025. I posted a very simple setup that could be used to keep things within range. SG is very important to overall stability. I also see that the tank is in a school, which opens up another possibility to why things died-contamination by say a cleaning solution, pesticide, paint fumes etc. Is that a possibility? It doesn't take much of a (airborne, or even residue on your hands) chemical to whack out a tank.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
trevbo44":2znz4gic said:
Wow, Vitz. You would think I was taking the money from your account to buy my livestock. I would rather receive responses from those who have checked their personality issues at the login page.
I have been getting the top-off water from another pal who is helping with the upkeep on the tank (the tank is at a school where we both work). The filter he uses is simply called a tap water filter. Fosters and Smith has it as a best seller but perhaps, as I am finding, it is not cutting the mustard.

if it's the 'tap water purifier' by aq. pharm. then it's not 1/2 bad-it's a fairly good d.i. unit-just not cost effective

your assumption that a water processor isn't 'cutting the mustard' when you don't know how to even check the recipe for the mustard you're making, or if the individual ingredient's are of acceptable quality is one reason i'm suggesting you turn the oven off and first go to cooking school
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Lawdawg":267lmmj1 said:
Vitz's POV (though bluntly put) is one that most people who have been in the hobby for years can understand, especially on these reefboards. It comes from reading/seeing/interacting with tons of people who don't educate themselves about the 'whys' of keeping these creatures alive and the sheer waste of living things due to the attitude that these are replaceable ornaments. It's quite irritating for someone to ask a question of us, we take the time to write out a good answer and they then proceed to totally disregard it. Not that I am putting you in that class BTW, just explaining the level of frustration. Some of these animals, while not endangered are still under pressure due to the continual hobby market for them (due in part to people who just replace the dead animals from their tanks with more taken from the sea instead of learning why they died and fixing the problem). Your comment about "taking money from your wallet to buy livestock" is quite correct. It's your money, spend it how you want but you might pause a moment and do an exercise in creative thinking. Imagine a tank full of puppies rather than fish...would you be so quick to throw another cocker spaniel in if the last one died without learning more about how keep them alive? To those of us who take these things seriously, proposing to add more fish before you fully figure out what's happening is just like putting another puppy in the tank to possibly die. :lol: don't even get me started on the "Finding Nemo" craze and how many posts on dying clownfish due to a lack of knowledge were answered on the internet. The reason we have this board is to extend knowledge, and hopefully to ease people past the learning curve that all of us went through. So, people can either take the time to learn how things how work and more importantly why they work, or they can keep loosing livestock, wasting living resources and cold hard cash.

Vitz is correct, attitude notwithstanding, there really isn't a reason for allowing the SG to swing that much and it is generally accepted that the range should be closer to 1.025. I posted a very simple setup that could be used to keep things within range. SG is very important to overall stability. I also see that the tank is in a school, which opens up another possibility to why things died-contamination by say a cleaning solution, pesticide, paint fumes etc. Is that a possibility? It doesn't take much of a (airborne, or even residue on your hands) chemical to whack out a tank.

thx :)

i don't believe in sugar coating ;)
 

trevbo44

Active Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Got it...metaphors are fun (puppies & cooking=reef keeping). I get what you are saying...killing fish is a bad idea as it exhausts an already exhausted natural resource. It certainly wasn't my plan.
The school is private and not susceptible to the same worries as a public school regarding spraying and the like. I like the idea of the top-off but I need something that won't look terribly out of place or unpleasant to the eye. I guess I'll have to be vigilant about adding water on a daily basis. Thanks for all your help.
 

benni

Active Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Wow Trev! Hope your back end is healing from the spanking you got. Seems off the charts bad when someone asks for help and they get the lashings that others have earned (try some bagbalm-you will heal quicker :wink: ). Having referred to this forum for a long, long time as a wealth of research and eventually signing up because of the help that could be received here, I want you to know that getting bitten when asking for help is not what this forum is about-I apologize for the others and hope you keep coming back.

Being a lover of saltwater tanks, in fact part of being with my tank at home helps me feel more connected with the mother that I lost when I was young. I love every critter in my tank and feel some grief when I have some die (accept that dang domino damsel-glad that bully is gone). I am sure having your tank at the school has some of the same effects on the kids there and I know you probably feel that pressure. All tanks have there ups and downs and asking others for their help is all we can do to bring the tank back to baseline.

What stinks here is that instead of getting help, you are lashed. So let's get back to the problem. Does anyone know what the symptoms mean that Trev described above on how the fish died? Is the 1.025 level a solid fact? I have heard from marine biologist's that that is too high and have talked to fish stores that say a SG of 1.021 is where it should be. So do we have opinions or fact? Also, is the alk stable? the pH seems low, anyone have any thoughts on that? Since a top off system is not the best situation for this tank, does anyone have any ideas on how to slow evaporation with out lowering the O2?

I am sorry that you lost those fish, I am sure that is the last thing you wanted to do. I know from private conversations that you forgot to communicate that you mostly try to get farmed raised specimans anyways. Although, seeing anything die is tragic. Well, that is that-I just hope that the ego maniacs don't treat their children or the one's they care about the same way they treated you when you made a mistake. Good luck with your tank!!!!!!
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
benni":35874f3x said:
Wow Trev! Hope your back end is healing from the spanking you got. Seems off the charts bad when someone asks for help and they get the lashings that others have earned (try some bagbalm-you will heal quicker :wink: ). Having referred to this forum for a long, long time as a wealth of research and eventually signing up because of the help that could be received here, I want you to know that getting bitten when asking for help is not what this forum is about-I apologize for the others and hope you keep coming back.

Being a lover of saltwater tanks, in fact part of being with my tank at home helps me feel more connected with the mother that I lost when I was young. I love every critter in my tank and feel some grief when I have some die (accept that dang domino damsel-glad that bully is gone). I am sure having your tank at the school has some of the same effects on the kids there and I know you probably feel that pressure. All tanks have there ups and downs and asking others for their help is all we can do to bring the tank back to baseline.

What stinks here is that instead of getting help, you are lashed. So let's get back to the problem. Does anyone know what the symptoms mean that Trev described above on how the fish died? Is the 1.025 level a solid fact? I have heard from marine biologist's that that is too high and have talked to fish stores that say a SG of 1.021 is where it should be. So do we have opinions or fact? Also, is the alk stable? the pH seems low, anyone have any thoughts on that? Since a top off system is not the best situation for this tank, does anyone have any ideas on how to slow evaporation with out lowering the O2?

I am sorry that you lost those fish, I am sure that is the last thing you wanted to do. I know from private conversations that you forgot to communicate that you mostly try to get farmed raised specimans anyways. Although, seeing anything die is tragic. Well, that is that-I just hope that the ego maniacs don't treat their children or the one's they care about the same way they treated you when you made a mistake. Good luck with your tank!!!!!!


most 'marine biologists' i've met don't know thing one about keeping marine ornamentals-most never even owned a tank or a fish in their lifetimes-many (if not most) don't even have much to do with fishkeeping in captivity but rather deal with any one of a huge field of topics/lines of interest-in fact, i work w/a pHd in marine bio whose lack of aptitude in even the most basic husbandry skills leaves alot to be desired, at best ;)

99% of lfs's don't know jack, and the whole thing about the lower sg is due mostly to a misunderstanding of when and by how much a lower sg is indeed beneficial

i've heard lfs owners/employees state that a slightly lower sg prevents ich :lol: :lol: :lol:

corals and inverts have no business being kept in anything but natural ocean salinity levels, and unless one is dealing with a specific hyposalinity treatment for a specific issue (which isn't .021, or .017), neither do fish

what's the s.g. of the ocean that our fish have been evolving/adapting in for milllions of years ? last i heard it was running about 35 ppt (app 1.025-1.026 sg), excepting some higher salinity areas, such as the red sea, which can get as high as 1.030 + in some areas, iirc (a FACT, not an OPINION)

What stinks here is that instead of getting help, you are lashed.

wrong-the poster got both, and given the lack of homework done on their part, i could reasonably argue that i may have been a bit too kind ;)

my 0.02

and fwiw, i see, treat, and feed hundreds of new tangs weekly with/for all sorts of issues, including 'hlle', prior to shipout to stores

a word about hlle-often, the condition's progression is 'solved' or stopped, only to leave the fish with (sometimes) scar tissue that will not heal over, leaving the hobbyist to mistakenly think that the 'disease' is still in progress/not fixed

a word about lower sg:

the 2 main reasons behind keeping systems at 017-021 are slightly elevated dissolved O2 levels (in most hobbyists's tanks, there's NO issue with low O2, however) and a SLIGHTLY reduced pathogen/parasite level. It should be used as a protocol ONLY in commercial sized systems, where due to the higher number of fish, every increase in O2 or reduction in parasite populations can be critical, especially given the rate of spread of pathogens due to increased fish densities/water volume

some do it thinking it causes them to use less salt, thereby cutting operating costs

some think that 017 is actually hyposalinity 8O

All tanks have there ups and downs and asking others for their help is all we can do to bring the tank back to baseline.



educating one's self before starting a new venture rather than waiting for others to spoon feed one important information due to improper prep work is also an option, and one seen to few and far between, not just in this hobby, but in the way most people approach everything, ime.

getting indignant about how one's treated by other's who DO give some decent advice but also make it a point of chiding the asker in the hope they don't continue with the waste of livestock due to that (ignorant)approach is laughable, imo ;)
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
No one need a PhD in child psychology to be a good parent. This is why you don't need a primate zoologist to do surgery on you. It is different to be an expert on a type of animal, and to be someone who can take care of them.
 

Sponsor Reefs

We're a FREE website, and we exist because of hobbyists like YOU who help us run this community.

Click here to sponsor $10:


Top