ANEMONEBUFF":q9p975ka said:
I have turtle grass from PR in my tank that was growing well under 20K 175 watt MH for some time. It grows even better under 10K XMs and 15K Iwasakis. It would probably be sustainable under some flourescent curlycue bulbs or PCs/T5 and would probably prefer the lower Kelvin bulbs(4500K-6500K). LED grow light for terrestrial plants would probably work great as well.
It depends on the color temp you need, though. Being as seagrass grows in pretty shallow beds it's going to prefer that lower Kelvin temp, which your subsequent photos demonstrate very well. (La Parguera, perchance? did you collect your grass yourself?) You note yourself that it may be the lower Kelvin rating bulbs that the seagrass might prefer, which would pretty much rule out LED lighting at this stage of the game. It can be done, but when you start trying to shift into the red spectrum then it seems to just fizzle out. Many people have been trying, but when it comes to penetration just through air and keeping that red end of the spectrum strong they don't yet have the push.
reefs4life":q9p975ka said:
very beautiful tank!!! so its better to have a lower kelvin scale and a higher wattage? and i know i cant grow turtle grass (too much matinence from what i read) i thought maybe the smaller varieties lol im on a low budget kinda thing so i cant really afford $200 lighting but im still wondering about the paddle and star grasses ive read in some places that they can survive lower light ( like 2 watts per gallon) since they are low growing species and grow further away from the natural sunlight, is this true???? :?:
It depends on what you're trying to grow. Seagrass occurs at.. jeez, deepest I've seen I was able to touch the bottom
and keep my head above water, so that's about 4' (in Puerto Rico, all Caribbean side). Yes definitely to higher wattage (PAR), because you're still trying to mimic the sun, and in many instances tropical sun at that.
I've never like the watt/gallon "rule". It doesn't account for factors such as tank depth, water clarity, bulb and fixture quality & output, etc., etc.
You might prefer to consider CFL (less expensive in almost all ways) or T5 (not so less expensive, also creates more heat) lighting, it would work best for you I think. Just keep the Kelvin temperature closer to the actual sun, instead of mimicking sunlight at depth (red waves are 'filtered' out first, then on down the spectrum til you're left with blue/ultraviolet), and you'll have the best prospects.
If it were me, I'd go with as many 100W 6500K Daylight (edited to add: CFLs, 100W equivelant) bulbs as I could comfortably fit in the hood. The single 175W, though, I might like even better. Except that I hate paying for HID lighting and not getting something back out of it.