yup, i remember that thread. i wondered if anything had become of the topic. with all the talk about mac conferences, letters from the wwf, usl, etc, i think that the INDUSTRY should be proactive on this as well. how can the industry begin to be cohesive without agreeing on definitions?
many of the terms i
saw in that thread still seem vague. why not KISS and go with accurate descriptors like: "wild", "first captive generation", "second captive generation", and "multiple captive generation"?
in the case of first generation frags farmed in the ocean rather than a tank (inside tank or outside tank)one could use something like "first gen seafarmed, second gen cap".
ultimately, this could all be shortened to #/letter designations like: "1s2c3c" meaning a specimen is first generation seafarmed,second and third generations captive raised.
i propose gaining a recognized nomenclature now. don't worry yet about who will enforce it. get it in place. if it is simple and accurate it is likely to be adopted on its merits. the first step is to have a system recognized by the varoius bodies in the industry.
[ March 16, 2002: Message edited by: valid ]
[ March 16, 2002: Message edited by: valid ]</p>