• Why not take a moment to introduce yourself to our members?

Kalkbreath

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The problem to overcome with fish shipping is not oxygen supply, but ammonia build up.. The pure oxygen filled within the bag is more then the fish can use........its the respiration that harms a fish. A sleeping fish {is better prepared for a stressfull event.....{like a human "under" and ready for open heart} and is producing less respriation{ammonia} and less likely to freakout and crap in the bag {gills}. This is also why cyanide is popular with the collectors, sleeping fish dont bump against the bucket for hours and spash about with fear! Cyanide fisH are also LESS stressed {poisoned, but well rested} I still say we need a better{ not harmfull} juice, net cought fish are usually barrier {gill net cought} an ruffled up ........ tranquilized fish never even now what happened .?
_________________
what is a recession
_________________
Ariakon SIM-5
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
kalk-the ammonia is not the prob-imho.at the low pH typically found in the bag-the ammonia should be harmless.

however,-if the water is saturated with CO2, then the fish will not be able to use the O2 in the bag-it must be able to dump it's own CO2 first, into the water-but it can't :wink:

this is prob'ly why fish can arrive alive and well sometimes in a waterless bag-they can actually dump the CO2 into the air space in the bag-or at least, so i theorize :wink:

when i acclimated shipments,we would do it in low pH sw, to first allow the fish to flush out the ammonia from it's tissues, before transfer to reg (ph)
sw.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Peter - How did you seal the bags in your tests? Did you use rubber bands or did you basicly vacuum seal the bag with a thermal strip sealer?
 

PeterIMA

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Reply to Kalk and Gensham concerning breathing bags.

Answer: The breathing bags can absorb oxygen and expel carbon dioxide provided they are in contact with cardboard, paper, or styrofoam. So, they can exchange gases across the styrofoam box and the external cardboard box if packed the way I described in a previous posting.

In my experiments, we sealed the breathing bags with elastics in the conventional manner. A heat sealer would be better (but the device is expensive).

I think that a better way may be to pack the fish in individual plastic containers (with holes punched in them.) Then place the plastic containers with fish in a large regular bag in a styrofoam box. The breathing bag (just one large one) would be in the center of the other bag along with the fish in individual plastic containers. This would save costs and solve other problems that I don't have time to discuss just now.

Peter Rubec
 

Kalkbreath

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I think you might had better re-think that one? This all in one bag idea would mean that one really dead fish would foul the water and risk killing all the fish! The other problem is that fish are packed in pure Oxygen, this has a much greater ability to keep the water saturated with o2 then simple air.........lastly, a build up of co2 {PH down}is what keeps the Amonia from killing the fish ......
_________________
Love Quotes Forum
_________________
Creole & Cajun Forum
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Kalkbreath":8dyboyxq said:
I think you might had better re-think that one? This all in one bag idea would mean that one really dead fish would foul the water and risk killing all the fish! The other problem is that fish are packed in pure Oxygen, this has a much greater ability to keep the water saturated with o2 then simple air.........lastly, a build up of co2 {PH down}is what keeps the Amonia from killing the fish ......

kalk- fish don't suffocate from lack of oxygen-they suffocate from too much CO2. :wink:

if they can't dump the CO2 from their bloodstream into the water via the gills, because the water is already saturated, then they cannot absorb the O2,even though it's also in the water. :wink:

(if i remember correctly-the transport location on the blood cell is the same for both-they have to dump one in order to pick up the other)


the answer would be to find a way to prevent the CO2 from building up in the water(which can hold a greater amount than it can O2), while using something else to keep the pH at a level that prevents the ammonia from 'burning' the tissues of the fish-i.e.-below neutral.

i don't think that a day or two in acidic water will stress the fish nearly as much as CO2 suffocation :wink:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
fwiw-

those bags sound like a very good idea

it's prolly the xtra few cents(or dollars)/bag on the shippers end that is 'preventing' them from being implemented as a tool in shipping.

the shipper has nothing to gain-he sells the fish regardless-why should he raise his shipping cost? :wink: :cry:

until fish are officially(read legally) viewed as 'true pets'-and not like 'merchandise' there will be no shipping reform-imho

but then, folks like you(kalk :wink: ) will start b*tchin' about longer inspection times at the airports,eh?


think about this-if the fish are shipped in a non stressfull manner-a few extra hours won't be adding to the mortality rates :wink:
 

PeterIMA

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Vitz, I think you understood what I was saying about breathing bags. Kalk's comments pertain to the situation with normal bags.
Breathing bags expel carbon dioxide and absorb oxygen. Hence, there is less of a drop in pH because carbonic acid does not accumulate. Hence, the fish are less stressed (as you pointed out).

Peter rubec
 

Kalkbreath

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
There is a reason ALL shippers use Pure Oxygen .The breath bags only let in Atmosphere. There are very little voids inside a tightly packed box, I would much rather have one cubic foot of pure O2 ...then one square foot Atmosphere .....{try leaving an un aerated 5 gallon bucket with forty clownfish in it for two days} I can "bag those same forty clownfish in a total ONE gallon of water, packed {one per bag} in pure oxygen for two days {and thousands are done this way every day}There also is a reason no shippers can risk having a leaky box. and you must seal the contants with a very leak proof outer bag..... Ps ,its the Ammonia that kills and its the {Co2 }lowered PH that keeps the fish alive and the less toxic state of lowered PH that would not exist with breath bags......Also explain again how the dead fishes juice in bag 29 of 50 would not contaminate the intire box of fifty fish in this all in one beathable bag idea?
_________________
grand daddy purple pics
_________________
Player positions
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Peter - The reason I asked, is I worked for some one who was testing those. He used a sealer in his tests. IMO the bags are great, but they need to improve the strength. Currently, if you look at them wrong, they pop(great for bar gobies and other none spiny fish). Man do brine shrimp live forever in them.
 

PeterIMA

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Reply to Kalk and Vitz about breathing bags.

You both have expressed important concerns.

Kalk's concerns (if I understand them) are the following.

1. Fish excrete carbon dioxide and ammonia. About 2/3rds or 3/4ths of the volume in a regular bag is oxygen and the rest water. In the test situation described previously with AMRI, there was no dissolved oxygen in the bags. Hence, the bags occupied a smaller volume in the shipping box. Theoretically, one could pack more bags in the box, but this would increase the weight of the shipping box. I packed pieces of styryfoam around the bags. It is necessary to ensure that there is no empty space, where the bags can be jostled around during shipping. the simplest way is probably to added styrofoam sheeting to partition the box, in order to keep the bags firmly in place.

2. The first thing we did was prepare a 80 gallon plastic pail of shipping water. To this we added about one teaspoonful of nitrofurazon powder and one teaspoon of Amquel (from Kordon/Novalek). The Amquel neutralized the ammonia excreted by the fish during the shipping period. The nitrofurazon controlled the proliferation of bacteria. The breathing bags did not drop in pH as much because the carbon dioxide given off by the fish was expelled across the membrane of the bag. I suspect that the drop in pH by itself (under the normal bag situation) is detrimental to the fish. My main point here is that nitrofurazone and Amquel need to be added (as I mentioned in my original post).

3. The breathing bags come in four sizes. For small fish the smallest bag is suitable, for larger fish a larger bag is needed. The largest bag can act as the outside "Liner bag" to keep water from leaking from the box if the other bags leak. Unnfortunately, the smaller bags do frequently leak and this needs to be brought to Novalek's attention. So, if one packs fish in bags, one should put them on a table or shelf long enough to determine which bags leak and not pack those bags. These bags could be (re) sealed with a heat sealer, prior to being packed in the box.


4. Kalk's point is that the outer Liner bag needs to be tightly sealed shut. The outer breathing bag is thicker and has less gas exchange capability. I suspect that if the Liner bag is tightly sealed, all the fish may die in the box containing breathing bags. Dr. Labbish Chao had this happen when testing the bags in the Amazon with neon tetras. One solution to this problem is to use a regular liner bag. Dr. Rofen suggested that the regular liner bag be inflated with oxygen and sealed after the breathing bags containing fish and water are put inside. I have not yet tested this approach.

My new approach (which I have not yet tested) is not to use small breathing bags. Put seawater into the large regular liner bag (or two liner bags insider one another if necessary). A fairly large breathing bag is inserted inside the Liner bag. Then plastic containers with the fish are packed around the breathing bag inside the liner bag.


The individual plastic contrainers have holes in them to allow the water to circulate and come in contact with the large breathing bag. The seawater still needs to have nitrofurazone and Amquel. This would allow the carbon dioxide from the fish to be absorbed by the breathing bag, and oxygen from the breathing bag to be passed to the water containing the fish. The advantage is that there is not much accumulation of carbonic acid in the shipping water, and no chance of leakage from either the liner bag or the smaller breathing bags (since the latter are not utilized). Breathing bags are more expensive than regular bags, and Filipino exportes are aware of this. Even, if what I describe is more expensive (I still need to evaluate the relative costs of the new approach). I am sure that the fish would be in much better condition and could survive in the boxes for a much longer period.

I have pointed out that the approach described still needs to be studied. Many of you could try it for yourselves (and hopefully let me know the results). Hopefully this response helps to address your concerns.

Peter Rubec
 

SPC

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Posted by Peter:
To this we added about one teaspoonful of nitrofurazon powder and one teaspoon of Amquel

-I wonder if there could be any long term physical problems to the animals by using these chemicals in such a confined space?
Steve
 

Kalkbreath

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thank you for the time you are giving this forum, I truly appreciate your input.........I,at times may seem combative..........but I hope i bring the other view points in the open , so we can have a FULL descussion .
_________________
Honda XL175
_________________
BMW Nazca C2
 

PeterIMA

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Response to SPC,
He asked whether there was any detrimental effects of using Amquel and nitrifurazone in such a confined space (shipping bag).

Answer-I don't think so. Amquel is widely used in the aquarium hobby and trade, and has been evaluated by AquaScience Research Ltd (John Farrel Kuhns holds a patent on the Amquel formulation and manufacturersw it for Kordon/Novalek.

With respect to nitrofurazone, it can be harmful if the powder is inhaled (by human beings). Once it is mixed and diluted in seawater, it should not be harmful to either the fish or humans. The experiments I conducted with Dr. Denise Petty indicated that it was an effective bacteriocide for marine fish (better than neomycin). Nitrofurazone is used by importers (and should be more widely used by exporters) since it does not interfere with trickle filters conducting biological filtration (converting ammonia to nitrate and nitrite).

The amount of chemical needed to treat a relatively large volume of water is small. Hence it can be done at low cost. Some company in the trade should sell these chemicals in solution (with premixed volumes) that could be diluted for use with fish shipments.

Peter Rubec
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
fwiw-i've packed fish w'aquel for 6 hr. trips-w/no ill effects whatsoever

pretty sure it's not harmful to fish at all-though, it may affect fish that have a heavy slime coat production, like mandarins-a similiar thing sometimes happens to discus w/ novaqua, and the like-it can literally smother them-seen it happen.
 

dizzy

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Peter,
Are there any issues with disposing of water that was treated with nitrofurazone? Would it be safe to dump the water into the sewer system? Also aren't there some restrictions about using this antibiotic on food fish? We are all aware of the dangers of over-prescribing antibiotics for human use. It seems to me if the fish were in breathing bags and possibly sedated a bit, then the antibiotic might be less necessary.

MG
 

SPC

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thanks for the response Peter.

Posted by dizzy:
Kalk,

I hope you were sucking up to Peter and not SPC.

-You don't think I'm worthy of a good old suck up dizzy? :wink: BTW, thank you for not jumping in and answering the question that I posed to Peter :wink:.
Steve
 

Sponsor Reefs

We're a FREE website, and we exist because of hobbyists like YOU who help us run this community.

Click here to sponsor $10:


Top