• Why not take a moment to introduce yourself to our members?

John_Brandt

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Aquaria 'risk to tropical fish'


By Alex Kirby
BBC News
September 30, 2003


Some of the most colourful and attractive fish to swim the tropical seas may be threatened by the aquarium trade, the United Nations believes.

It says over 20 million fish and about half as many other forms of marine life are caught every year for the trade.


_39397844_harlequin_203_guldberg.jpg

Resplendent: Harlequin tuskfish (Image: Ove Hoegh Guldberg)

There is also a persistent demand for some forms of coral, the UN believes.

But it says the aquarium trade, if it is properly managed, can help coastal communities to climb out of poverty.

The report, From Ocean To Aquarium: The Global Trade In Marine Ornamentals, is launched by the UN Environment Programme's World Conservation Monitoring Centre (Unep-WCMC), which is based in Cambridge, UK.

Topical warning

The report is timed to coincide with the launch of the Disney movie Finding Nemo, the story of a clown anemonefish separated from his dad on Australia's Great Barrier Reef, who ends up in a dentist's surgery.

Together with the blue-green damselfish, the clown fish heads the list of the most traded tropical fish.


_39397848_boatman_203_avincent.jpg

Indonesian seahorse fisherman (Image: A Vincent)


The report says the annual catch from tropical seas for the marine aquarium trade in Europe and the US totals more than 20 million fish from 1,471 species, ranging from the sapphire devil to the copperhead butterflyfish.

Another 9-10 million creatures from about 500 species, including molluscs, shrimps and anemones, are caught as well, with up to 12 million stony corals taken from the wild each year.

Hope for the poor

The report says the annual value of the trade, which is concentrated in south-east Asia, is $2-300m. In the Maldives, one kilogramme of aquarium fish was valued at almost $500, while the same weight of reef fish for food was worth only $6.

The live coral trade is worth about $7,000 per tonne, against $60 for a tonne of coral used for making limestone.

The UN says the aquarium trade is worth about $5.6m a year to Sri Lanka, providing 50,000 people in low-income areas with jobs - and, it says, with a strong incentive to conserve the fish and the reefs.


_39397854_cardinal_203_wabnitz.jpg

Cardinal fish: Widely sought (Image: Colette Wabnitz)


The executive director of the UN Environment Programme, Dr Klaus Toepfer, said: "Collecting tropical fish brings pleasure to millions.

Barbaric and short-sighted

"The global trade in marine species poses a significant risk to valuable ecosystems like coral reefs, but it has great potential as a source of desperately-needed income for local fishing communities."

Although the trade is mainly legitimate, the report details some methods which are certainly not sustainable.


_39397852_clam_203_genevois.jpg

Giant clams are not immune (Image: Cedric Genevois)


One of the authors, Colette Wabnitz, said: "A minority of fishermen, in countries such as Indonesia, use sodium cyanide to capture fish. An almost lethal dose of the poison is squirted into the reef where the fish shelter.

"It stuns them to allow capture and export, but can also kill coral and other species. The fish may survive the export process but usually die of liver failure soon after being purchased."

Gold standard

The report relies heavily on data from the Global Marine Aquarium Database, compiled by Unep-WCMC, the Marine Aquarium Council (MAC), and members of different trade associations.

Ed Green, another of the report's authors, urged traders to sign up to the MAC certification scheme.

He said fish certified by the council were healthier and had a better chance of survival because they were treated according to internationally approved standards of best practice.
 

Bill2

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Been Gone for a while but been lurking.

Funny how 2 of the pictures on the article are actually sucess stories imo.

The Banggai Cardinalfish according to Scott Michael has actually expanded territory due to collection (some theorize a boat that was collecting them turned over)

Most of the tridacna species we see in the hobby are being farmed. (Notice did not say all)

This article has PR written all over it!
 

MaryHM

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Well, this is exactly why I refused to contribute to Mr. Green's database- much to his frustration. We had a conversation about it at the last Marine Ornamentals. I told him there was no way I was going to contribute information to a database, when anyone could interpret the results anyway they needed. Especially with such incomplete data as he was making public. And here we go- let's threaten the industry with the UN now. MAC tried threatening us with the USCRTF a few years back- in fact that's what caused most people to throw their support behind MAC. Now that we aren't afraid of that, they need another scare tactic to keep us loyal to MAC- the saviors of the reef and the industry. Frankly, I find it disgusting. MAC urged everyone involved with them to contribute to this database and now the information is being used against the industry. Nice going, MAC.
 

John_Brandt

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It's worth reading the full report to the United Nations Environment Program by WCMC before coming to any conclusions about what the report might mean. It is an interesting read for anyone, and most will find things that irk them or that they believe are wrong.

It's hot off the press and it's a 1 MB download of a .pdf file.


unep-logo-bl.gif


http://www.unep.org/


From Ocean to Aquarium: The Global Trade in Marine Ornamentals

aquarium2.jpg


http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?ArticleID=4259&DocumentID=332&l=en
 

MaryHM

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I didn't have to look very hard to confirm my suspicions that MAC sees this report as very favorable to them- a new scare tactic to garner industry support again. Here ya go- straight from John's mouth in the General Discussion Board:

Importantly, this news report is now presented to mass media worldwide. The trade may need to answer some serious questions asked by serious and powerful environmental interests. Having MAC as a legitimate and tangible alternative to 'business as usual' is an great asset when the heat gets turned up politically on these issues.

I AM SO SICKENED BY THIS. MAC PURPOSEFULLY URGED ALL SUPPORTERS TO CONTRIBUTE TO THIS DATABASE FOR THIS VERY PURPOSE. That is exactly why I refused to contribute to it. Just another MAC manipulation. DISGUSTING.
 

John_Brandt

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
That was my interpretation and speculation of consequences of the news article.

That was before I found the report itself. I think it's good and in many ways serves as a testament to how responsible the trade already is and how it could be more so. I did not know that I was to be referenced in this report and it was a surprise to me when I read it.

Just pick out your individual grievances within the article and comment on those rather than just blaming MAC for a grand conspiracy.
 

MaryHM

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Just pick out your individual grievances within the article and comment on those rather than just blaming MAC for a grand conspiracy.

First of all, I don't need you to tell me how to respond to a post. Thanks anyway.

It was MAC who urged everyone to contribute to this database. Seriously urged. Practically begged. It was me who said "not no, but hell no" and explained that this data would come back to haunt us. It was MAC who told me I was wrong/paranoid and that the data was not going to be used against the industry. This was all when I was still "MAC friendly". I'm not blaming them John, I'm pointing out the facts. I know how much MAC hates that.
 

MaryHM

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
This is such a blatant publicity release. The more I read, the more sickened I am.

Data for the new report has largely come from the Global Marine Aquarium Database, a joint collaborative effort between UNEP-WCMC, the Marine Aquarium Council (MAC) and members of various aquarium trade associations.


“Fish certified by the Marine Aquarium Council are healthier and have better survival chances because they are collected, handled and transported according to internationally approved best practice standards,” says Ed Green another author of the report. “We encourage responsible traders to sign up to the MAC certification scheme and for the public to only buy from reputable dealers. Only by such means can we ensure a trade, from reef to retail, that is sustainable and beneficial for all.”

Where is Mr. Green's data that MAC fish "are healthier and have better survival chances"?? Do you have access to that data, John? Or are we just supposed to take MAC's word for it?
 

Bill2

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Some interesting tidbits in the report.

States only 1/5th of the giant clams are cultured. (P.9) Where are the other 4/5ths since all the wholesalers I know are bringing in clams from farms.

States only 1% of corals are bred.(p. 8) Shows the limitations of the "bred" lable since probalby over 80% of corals are propagated in the hobby.

Palau live rock? P.9

Exporting of fish is going down? P.18

Are soloman island disks considered coral pieces? p.22

What about sarcophyton elegens? p.25

More to come :)
 

Bill2

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Overall the report is very good IMO. There are some mistakes but the recommendations by the authors are pretty right on. That's where the problem comes. Who besides nutso hobbyists are going to read the article. The blurb on the BBC is misleading and doesn't even really touch the recommendations of sustainable harvest and management when that is about 1/2 of what the report is about.

BTW John I'm curious when this report by the UN was started and since you "scale" was included I'm sure you were consulted.
 

MaryHM

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Who besides nutso hobbyists are going to read the article. The blurb on the BBC is misleading and doesn't even really touch the recommendations of sustainable harvest and management when that is about 1/2 of what the report is about.

Precisely. Heck, I don't even have the patience to wait for the stupid .pdf to download via my sucky dial up connection. It's just more sensationalist PR from the MAC camp. Throw out the scare tactics or throw out the fluff. They are extremely comfortable with either scenario. It's the facts that they tend to steer clear from...
 

PeterIMA

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have not read the report yet, but see some glaring errors in what was posted (like a minority of fishermen use cyanide in Indonesia). As far as I know, cyanide is widely used and totally out of control in Indonesia for both capture of aquarium fish and food fish.

Peter Rubec
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Whats a Copperhead Butterfly, and what fools trained them to keep them in jars?

Polydactylus plebeius is a threadfin BUT not ANY of the fish in the picture.

Harlquin Tuskfish insn't a Choerodon fasciatus.
 

clarionreef

Advanced Reefer
Location
San Francisco
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Yeah,
I read it.
In the first pages I was stopped in my tracks by the first photo of a fish being labeled incorrectly [chaetodon plebius was called a polydactylus plebius] then there were "copperHEAD" butterflyfish being put into plastic jars...[ not the authors fault but a big no-no. Chelmons or copperBAND butterflys ruin their noses and starve quicker in jars].
Then the photo of a harlequin tuskfish [lienardella fasciata] labeled a choerodon fasciatus...and this was just for starters.
In the preface it was pointed out that much "opinion" and hearsay has muddled the truth of things and that the purpose of this paper was more of a quantitative and authoritative last word on matters.
...and then I read the rest.
If you look at the bibliography, you will find all the folks who have ever contributed to the body of opinion and hearsay during the past 20 years or so... All of their stuff was put into a huge blender and it came out "quantitative and authoritative?"
The report was pretty much a big book report that raises more question than it answers. It sought to clarify things and made them more confusing.
For example, did you know that Mexcio ships out more invertebrates than Indonesia? Absurd right? Until you know that 98% of the inverts in question are turbo snails. So with that in mind...what do you know really?
Damsels are the most common fish in the trade? Really? Anyone could've told you that for free....but even then, it still means nothing of significance.
A 5 month domino damsel is nothing like a 3 year old imperator angel. It has no where near the environmental value as an adult imperator. Lumping them together as empiracle units provides a handle to misunderstand things....for the benefit of outsiders who need such a simplification of information.
The conservation section was indicative of who had more access to the author or who wanted to have access. Since a number of sources and players turned him down for information, he naturally gravitated to those more disposed to cooperate with him.
The conservation conclusions were a summary of things hashed out more thoughtfully in this forum. They are already dated and stuck in the dramas of years gone by. I'll stop now. But I do have about 250 other observations of note.
It was timed for Nemos release? Fitting I guess and just as entertaining.
Steve
PS. For a polite request, a pizza and a pitcher of ice tea, he could've gotten this thing proofread. The less you know about the real trade in marine fish, the better this thing looks.
 

Bill2

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Beyond the stupid mistakes I do believe this the report is worth more than some are giving it credit. This is one of the first reports that I have seen that are not a knee jerk reaction report and offer the average joe some true insite into the goings on in the hobby.

This is a step in the right direction albeit a flawed one but a step no less.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The point is, these people are supposed to be scientists, where was their peer review of this paper? They really missed all that?
 

clarionreef

Advanced Reefer
Location
San Francisco
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Bill,
I agree. It does give the average Joe something to read. Kinda like an intermediate guide to a broad spectrum of concerns.
Everything that attracts a mass audience has to be 'dumbed down' enough to be understood by the less interested or part time interested layman, basic funder, part time environmentalist or average retailer.
But my point is that he wasn't an expert on anything other than data collation. He wasn't an expert trying to teach an audience...he was an outsider trying to get a handle on things. Outsiders are so easily fooled and so unable to detect and correct basic errors. If the foundation of work is laid this way...than what can we hope for in the conclusions?
In sailing...one degree off course translates into hundreds of miles three weeks later. It works pretty much the same in this work. There are wild swings in numbers and figures, declines and increases based on purely anecdotal evidence and interviews. I am close enough to some of this to know that some things 'found out' are just downright silly and now am left to wonder.... what about the rest?
Still, I agree. Its an OK survey for the average Joe. Now to what use it will be put is the question.
Steve
PS Perhaps I'm just jealous at all the people now making a buck off tropical fish who don't get wet.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Bill2":2p6vprri said:
Maybe you should get a real internet connection!

Friends don't let friends dial up!
:)


hey!!!!

isn't that Chucker's line? :P
 

Sponsor Reefs

We're a FREE website, and we exist because of hobbyists like YOU who help us run this community.

Click here to sponsor $10:


Top