For every one hobby cyanide fishermen in PI .......there are one hundred food fish collectors......fishing alongside.with their cyanide bottles{50 % of seafood tested for cyanide}.......the chances of inadvertently collecting some of the fish that they stunned with juice is high....If reports are true that very few fish are in some of the collection zones..{blue hula}.Then the chances of collecting one out of twenty blue bluetangs that were in the seafood fishermen's cyanide plume is much greater if there are only two hundred and fifty blue tangs in that area {25out of 250]......Thats ten percent and I am suggesting that perhaps three percent of current hobby collected fish have been exposed to food fish industry fishermen........ .The question is, what if this is true..........what happens if even a controlled collection experiment {with nets} proves that even Steve Cortez or You........... will unknowingly collect second hand cyanide exposed fish on an average of one ore two percent??{its like weekly drug testing at work ......even if you only come up with illegal drugs in your pee,two percent of the time....?...Your still going to get fired when that second time in a hundred shows up} How would the public, reeformers, or MAC react to a non perfect score........If twenty percent {last testing results} is clearly not acceptable....... what number is ?............and what if circumstances beyond our hobbies control prevent us from reaching the set goal ? What is the goal ........? What result would you deem acceptable? And why is it that very few readers are willing to answer this tuff question?