• Why not take a moment to introduce yourself to our members?

keethrax

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
dizzy":3auhodpm said:
I'd have to say the high mortality has a ripple effect. How many wholesalers and retailers are out of the biz because of high loses in stock and consequent damage to the bottom line. I'd say it is an incredibly high number. I'm 100% in favor of better handling and better husbandry. I do believe rough handling has a delayed effect, as well as the obvious loses before the hobbyist level. Some fish may be strong enough to survive the rigors of moving through the chain of custody, but die prematurely from its effects. I'm just suggesting that better handling may not equal the need for less fish to be taken.
Mitch

Sure, but a wholesaler/distributor going out of business isn't likely to encourage/discourage a new hobbyist. And so doesnt' seem like it should have too much impact on the demand. Fish having a repuation for dying in the aquariums and being difficult to keep will. Fish dying enroute seems to me like it is removed enough from the hobbyist (at least the entry ones that would be the source of increased demand) that it won't have too much of an affect.

It may cause a price shift, but a new keeper is probably buying relatively inexpensive fish anyhow, and so the price shift isn't likely to affect there decision.

It may also put some retailers out of business, but I doubt there are that many peopel who aren't a reasonable drive form a fish store of some sort taht woudl ahpppily sell them a "beginner setup". And so I doubt even teh retailers going out of business has much affect other than perhaps in pricing.

Time for another made up example:

Johnny Newbie has decided to start a saltwater tank. SO he goes to his LFS, buys all the equipemtn they want to sell him, wet/dry filteer. acrylic sump, miracle mud,skimmer, tank, stand, salt, pumps, etc, etc etc.

Then he buys a bunch of live rock.

At this point he's out a *lot* of money. THe price of the fish themsleves is such a small protion of his total budget that it would take a substantial bump in price to change his mind.

/end made up example

Now if he's buying fish that have just arrived at teh LFS tank, then what you say seems to make more sense. As then *he* will be the one to get a dying fish due to whatever stress you care to name. Be it cyanide/poor shipping/handling/etc.

But if the fish has been in the LFS tanks for a while, they end up with the dead fish if it was in the process of dying from shipping.

So if one buys fish reasonably intelligently, the capture/transport/handling stress is seperated (mostly) fomr teh ease/difficulty in caring for the fish.

If the fish isn't in the store for very long, that seperation is not present, and what you say seems to make a lot more sense. But an experienced aquarist will leave it in the store (with a deposit if required) and so will insulate themselves to a much larger extent from the fish mortality associated with poor capture/shipping. So mortality in the experienced tank is further removed from shipping stress anyhow.

And mortality in the Johnny Newbie's tank form the example is likely to be more due to a new tank and lack of experience regardless of how healthy the animal was when he purchased it.

So you have two rough classes of people. Experienceed and new.

The experienced aquarist seperates himself form shipping mortality by leaving dead/dying fish in the store. Over the course of his aquarium keeping lifetime, he will kill many more fish. But by forcing the supply chain to eat the cost of short term shipping moortality his spending dollars should lead to teh supply chain doing its best to minimize DOA's to a large extent because shipping a fish that doesn't make it into an aquarist tank is an expensive waste of somebody in that chain's money. And as you said, it's these guys that are responsible for many more fish.

The new guy will buy the fish with less of an eye for healthy fish, proabbly won't pay to have them held, etc. and will in all liklihood have a tank that isn't ready for whatever fish he's putting in it. These guys are going to see high mortality regardless of capture/fishing stress.

So I don't see how capture shipping stress (as opposed to improved ease of care) has much influence on demand. Some, certainly as the less stressed fish will survive better to a degree. But the ones benefitting from that are going to be the experienced keeprers more often than not, and they should (though don't always) know enough to not purchase an animal until in demonstrably healthy and eating if at all possible. And as the experience guys aren't likely to bail on the hobby due to a fish loss here and there, teh longer it lives in there tank, teh fewer fish they end up removing (multiplied by some factor based on how many fish are collected to get one fish to the aquarium).
 

keethrax

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
MaryHM":ktyd9zll said:
Here's a frightening thought (I think I've brought it up before). What is the number one thing a layperson says when you tell them what you do for a living (or a hobby)? "Oh my goodness! Saltwater aquariums! I've always wanted one, but it's so difficult and so much work. My friend's cousin's sister-in-law's stepmother had a saltwater tank and spent thousands of dollars, only to have everything die." Now, what if this industry/hobby reduced it's mortalities to near zero with better shipping/handling and technology. And everyone told everyone how easy saltwater tanks are to keep. Is it possible that we'd get a huge influx of new hobbyists and actually put MORE collection pressure on the reefs?? Just something to think about over pie. :)

That logic really doesn't fly unless you lump colleection/shipping mortality with moratilty afterwards. Not as far as I can see anyhow. it's not the fish that die on the way to the store that deter people, it's the stories of the ones that died after getting home that deter people.

And yes, that part is kinda scary.
 

MaryHM

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Keethrax,

I am lumping all of that mortality together. That the techniques, both on the industry side and hobby side are perfected so a fish rarely dies. Then my scenario takes form and consumes every living thing on the reef!!!! AHHHHHHHH!!!

But seriously, we're dealing with live animals here. Not canned corn. There's always going to be mortality. I don't care if you're collecting with nets, holding/packing/transporting each fish at an optimum level, acclimating perfectly, no airline problems, etc... There will STILL be mortalities. As soon as you guys (hobbyists) want to start a new craze of arranging canned corn on your bookshelves, then I can guarantee you a hobby with no mortalities (at least prior to the 10 year expiration date!). Hey, we can even use baby corn (nano corn!!). It's a new trend!! Hallelujah, I've found a new niche so I can escape this industry! Keethrax, please start spreading the word that canned corn arranging is the new "it" hobby. Wayne, please start researching the detrimental effects of growing corn on the rainforests or whatever. Folks, I think we've solved the problem.
 

keethrax

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
MaryHM":23i4dglh said:
Keethrax,

I am lumping all of that mortality together. That the techniques, both on the industry side and hobby side are perfected so a fish rarely dies. Then my scenario takes form and consumes every living thing on the reef!!!! AHHHHHHHH!!!

But seriously, we're dealing with live animals here. Not canned corn. There's always going to be mortality. I don't care if you're collecting with nets, holding/packing/transporting each fish at an optimum level, acclimating perfectly, no airline problems, etc... There will STILL be mortalities. As soon as you guys (hobbyists) want to start a new craze of arranging canned corn on your bookshelves, then I can guarantee you a hobby with no mortalities (at least prior to the 10 year expiration date!). Hey, we can even use baby corn (nano corn!!). It's a new trend!! Hallelujah, I've found a new niche so I can escape this industry! Keethrax, please start spreading the word that canned corn arranging is the new "it" hobby. Wayne, please start researching the detrimental effects of growing corn on the rainforests or whatever. Folks, I think we've solved the problem.

I don't quite get what you're getting at. I'm not arguing that as they become easier to *keep* (not to ship) that the demand will go up, and this will increase the collection pressure. All the more reason to have to collect fewer animals per animal that makes it to the end of the chain.

I don't see how looking for ways to reduce mortality equates to someone who believes it's possible to eliminate it. Furthermore, you'll note that I said that I suspect the handling/shipping stress is a self-correcting "problem". And will be as long as the shipping portion remains expensive. paying air fireght for an animal that doesn't get sold off the end of the chain (and therefore doesnt' feed money back into the industry) is bad for business, and as far as I'm concerned they're doign a pretty good job of shipping fish these days. If someone were to creat a magical mehtod of reducing transportation costs to low enough, then perhaps it becomes economical to not worry about collection/hadnling stress. Bus as long as we have to pay to put the fish on an airplane and fly them (at least once) large distances, simple economics will ensure those with decent technique will outcompete those without.

As far as ease of keeping goes, and its effect on demand. That's an interesting issue to be sure, but again, not relevant to a thread about shipping/handling methods.

Now some shipping/handling stress will cause mortalities in the aquarium after purchase, but if you purchase intelligently you should be able to force the supply chain to take that loss and not you as a hobbyist. And in order to minimize those losses the chain will (and has) evolved to be pretty good at handling/shipping fish.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
MaryHM":252p55bt said:
Keethrax,

I am lumping all of that mortality together. That the techniques, both on the industry side and hobby side are perfected so a fish rarely dies. Then my scenario takes form and consumes every living thing on the reef!!!! AHHHHHHHH!!!

But seriously, we're dealing with live animals here. Not canned corn. There's always going to be mortality. I don't care if you're collecting with nets, holding/packing/transporting each fish at an optimum level, acclimating perfectly, no airline problems, etc... There will STILL be mortalities. As soon as you guys (hobbyists) want to start a new craze of arranging canned corn on your bookshelves, then I can guarantee you a hobby with no mortalities (at least prior to the 10 year expiration date!). Hey, we can even use baby corn (nano corn!!). It's a new trend!! Hallelujah, I've found a new niche so I can escape this industry! Keethrax, please start spreading the word that canned corn arranging is the new "it" hobby. Wayne, please start researching the detrimental effects of growing corn on the rainforests or whatever. Folks, I think we've solved the problem.

indeed

i was in the habit of illustrating that to most of my true 'hobbyist customers'.

you WILL lose at least 3-5% of all fish you keep in your lifetime prematurely , from cancer, heart attacks, agression, honest mistakes, equipment malfunctions, etc., and the longer you're in the hobby, the larger the actual number will be

i for one do NOT think that the scenario of everyone being so successful, and so many hobbyists exploding all over the place, is one we'll have to deal with at any future time, and if it is, by then aquaculture will prob'ly be supplying most everything available for the market

i seriously doubt there'll be enough of any reef left, (at least, not enough to be of ANY commercial value) by the time that happens,-aquaculture as the source for sw livestock will HAVE to be the only means available, even if cyanide is halted tomorrow by all of the fish collection industries, mo, and food alike(it's still no excuse or justification for using cyanide, of course)

pollution of the oceans, (possible) global warming, air emitted pollutants, will be enough on their own to wipe most of it out soon, at the rate we're dirtying things up

anyone look at china's industrial growth/expansion rate, lately ?
 

MaryHM

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I was just making a hypothetical scenario based on decreased mortalities. Just a joke really. Nothing directed personally at you or your views. You haven't really said much that I disagree with. I should have put a ****** line between the AHHHH! and the But seriously- because that second paragraph wasn't directed at you. Just directed in general.
 

naesco

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
MaryHM":1h6b3ujn said:
Note that the same exporters that bring you cyanide also pack poorly which seriously weakens fish.

THAT IS SO WRONG. The same exporters that bring us net caught also pack poorly which seriously KILLS the fish. Remember, that's why I had to quit buying from them?? The older exporters know how to pack fish. Don't think they don't for a second. They've been doing it for years- decades. For someone who admits to having never seen a shipment from anywhere, you sure do have lots of (wrong) opinions about it. Ask Steve, he'll tell you who packs better.

SO WHERE IS THE TRUTH mary :roll: :roll:

The statement you just made here (which I have highlighted or the belowmentioned statement which you made in 2001

"The fish have been kept in the coral system for the last 3 years. Granted, we don't do a lot of fish, but the fish we import are all GUARANTEED HAND CAUGHT. Makes a huge difference in the health of the animal. Knock on wood, we've only had a disease problem once when we brought in a net caught shipment from the Philippines. It's amazing how much healthier truly net caught fish are.

Every day in every way in are painting yourself in the same corner as the LA boys.
 

MaryHM

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Um, where have you been for the past several months? With your head up your sumphole? Back in 2001 I was having great luck with the fish. Then the quality severely deteriorated. Severely. To the point where net caught fish were far, far LESS healthier than those from other suppliers. Seriously, how many times do I have to repeat myself about that. Here is the simple version for the simple minded. Please pay attention this time.

In the beginning there were net caught fish. And they were good. Very good. Then they got less and less healthy. I racked my brain, Steve's brain, Peter's brain, Tim's brain, Kyle's brain, Ferdie's brain trying to figure out why. I came up with nothing but hundreds of dead fish time and time again. I still hung in there, trying to fight the good fight. But it got to a point where I couldn't financially do it anymore. I had to make a choice. So I brought in target fish from the supplier who didn't claim to be 100% net caught, but who I had been buying known net caught species from for a few years. Lo and behold, low mortality. VERY low mortality. And not just in the beginning, but consistently ALL OF THE TIME. And we have not had one major disaster in the past several months.
 

MaryHM

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Your quote quip got me to thinking. 2001? I sure didn't remember ordering from Marivi then. Then I started researching. I looked at my Quickbooks and found we didn't import anything from Marivi until 2003. Our first attempt at net caught PHILIPPINE fish was back in 2001. Via Amry. That is the line in the quote about "Knock on wood, we've only had a disease problem once when we brought in a net caught shipment from the Philippines. ". At that point in time (2001) we were only bringing in hand caught fish from Fiji and Solomons. And heck yeah those fish were (are) strong. They always have been. Geez, there's only about 20 species anyway from there available regularly and they're all hardy ones. We tried the net caught PI once and got severely burned. Didn't try again until Marivi in Feb. 2003. When you're pulling quotes out from 3 years ago, make sure you know what you're quoting and what the context is. Heck, even back then I was saying that net caught PI fish SUCK. The quote was saying that we had only had one disease problem in our system and that was from PI fish- it wasn't saying we only had one disease problem out of multiple PI shipments. That quote referred solely to Fiji and Solomons fish, and yes- it is amazing how hardy those fish are.
 

MaryHM

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Sorry to Sump-ify this thread a bit, and sorry to break the discussion up, but I can't help it :

CONGRATS ON 2x{squat}, Mary!!!

Woo-hoo!!! 2,000 posts!!!

WOO-HOO!

Sorry I missed this earlier, Chip. Thank you! I wouldn't have noticed if you hadn't pointed it out. I'm not sure whether to be proud or ashamed.
8) :?: :oops:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
it's a badge of honor-only thing that matters is that the wearer is proud of it :wink:

but then again, i'm just a recreational poster :P
 

horge

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
7745 posts.... eeeeeegads.
Have you always had koko for your avatar?
I can't seem to remember...
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
horge":21rhp8xd said:
7745 posts.... eeeeeegads.
Have you always had koko for your avatar?
I can't seem to remember...

w/the exception of my other 2 aliases, yes :lol:
 

Sponsor Reefs

We're a FREE website, and we exist because of hobbyists like YOU who help us run this community.

Click here to sponsor $10:


Top