A
Anonymous
Guest
it seems to me that a good part of the discussion here re: 'case's' bill, and mamti, have only been discussed in terms of how they'll affect the trade here in the u.s., almost to the point of ignoring the international aspects/causes/effects involved
what do you think will happen vis-a-vis the pressures/demands of other countries' mo industries on the reefs post 4928/mamti ?
what about the collection pressures from other countries ? the aquarium industry is international in scope, after all.....
will the reduced (potentially) market here just lead to cheaper fish elsewhere ?
will passing the bill possibly help those in the u.s. think the issues of reef habitat destruction are being solved, only to find out that the problems are still there, only to be contributed to, and worsened, by other nations ?
what about other countries' (and our own)food fish industry ?
what do you think will happen vis-a-vis the pressures/demands of other countries' mo industries on the reefs post 4928/mamti ?
what about the collection pressures from other countries ? the aquarium industry is international in scope, after all.....
will the reduced (potentially) market here just lead to cheaper fish elsewhere ?
will passing the bill possibly help those in the u.s. think the issues of reef habitat destruction are being solved, only to find out that the problems are still there, only to be contributed to, and worsened, by other nations ?
what about other countries' (and our own)food fish industry ?