cortez marine":1tcu47av said:
Hes right of course.
It doesn't matter who tells the truth does it? Whats more worthy?
Truth spoken by a child...or a lie by a king....
Or do we only take truth from people we like socially?
Steve,
You of all people can understand the inherent contradiction of the trade.
You have seen destruction on a massive scale, done by the trade, for the trade. This destructive power cannot be whitewashed over as it is fact.
Comparing this destructive plunder-for-profit to the government-approved tourist infrastructure development is crazy. It is destructive only to the trade, and is as puerile as the teenager argument "But Dad, everyone is doing it!"...
Yes, building an island where one did not exist is destructive. Yes, it used a lot of coral rubble and sediment. Christ, the Maldives are a bunch of freakin'
ATOLLS! It isn't like they can blow up the mountains and bring the rubble down to the water front. This ain't Japan... (And I don't exactly hear much about the airport they built in Hong Kong where a mountain was leveled and an entire bay was filled in.) Could the reason why the Maldives does not allow coral collection possibly be due to the problems with El Nino-induced bleaching, where many of the reefs experienced losses of 90%? And this atoll in the Maldives... Looking at a map, I count either 21 or 22 separate atolls, depending on how you draw the lines. So one airport built on one atoll with localized reef destruction for tourist development is worse than the nearly nationwide reef degradation in the Philippines, a land of 7,100 islands?
Call me crazy, but the destructive methods used and the over-fishing pressure in the Philippines alone is worse than one airport built on one atoll.
Kalk may often minimize eco-destruction by our trade and yet I find it far more destructive to hear the new eco-corporate types minimize fisherfolk and human beings in their search for remedies to suit their narrow sensitivities... and skill sets.
Steve
Minimizing the damage by the trade does it a disservice. Acknowleging the damage is the first step in figuring out how to reverse it. The knowledge base is there. We've just been want to apply it, mostly because it is going to force some people to change.
Regards.
Mike Kirda