Just some food for thought

[Len]

Please note this isn't an administrative rule but merely my personal food for thought: I think we'd have more constructive debates if we could exclude specifically naming parties that really needn't be named (that is, when naming has little pratical or constructive value). IMHO, unnecessarily putting certain participants on the defensive seems to impede discussion rather then encourage it, and often it shifts the true focus of our discussions. My two cents.

 

[Len]

I'm also a bit concerned that there is more recent focus on critiqueing other business' practices, which is not the intent of this forum. Let's keep our discussions relevant to the state of the industry (I am aware that some of these critiques are relevant, but there are many that are not) and helping each other out.