A
Anonymous
Guest
Whats with all the question marks? Looks you're questioning your own validity
. Which makes sense in your case;
<blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr> Are the corals we remove from the Pacific reefs mostly branching? off the reef itself? not the floor? And does not most of this type of weed
coral growth end up as rubble on the floor? <hr></blockquote>
You're wasting your time verbalizing these semantics. Even though your comments on where ramose species "end up" after being destroyed naturally aren't wholly correct (they are structural builders to a point, albeit a significant/important one), you are also out of line to insinuate that "weed coral growth ending up as rubble on the floor" isn't important to the geology and morphometrics of the reef and its lagoonal/local components. Storms are natural selection. We are not. Did you even READ what I posted earlier about effects of unnatural selection of morphologies?
<blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr> Are the corals we remove from the Pacific reefs mostly branching? off the reef itself? not the floor? And does not most of this type of weed
coral growth end up as rubble on the floor? <hr></blockquote>
You're wasting your time verbalizing these semantics. Even though your comments on where ramose species "end up" after being destroyed naturally aren't wholly correct (they are structural builders to a point, albeit a significant/important one), you are also out of line to insinuate that "weed coral growth ending up as rubble on the floor" isn't important to the geology and morphometrics of the reef and its lagoonal/local components. Storms are natural selection. We are not. Did you even READ what I posted earlier about effects of unnatural selection of morphologies?