A
Anonymous
Guest
Cortez Marine":bozak7k4 said:Bookfish":bozak7k4 said:Steve, are you saying that these "inconvenient environmentalists" are being ridiculed unfairly
When I think of the terms "environmentalists" and "environmental organizations", I think of NPO's like Greenpeace, WWF ..."
I don't.
I used to but I don't anymore.
As former California assemblyman Jesse Unruh said;
The funding questions have become so central, so great and so critical that the new environmental groups are better at saving greenbacks now then saving anything else.Money is the mothers milk of politics
Using environmental problems to gain funding is not the same as using funding to solve problems.
A central theme of the past decade was that NGOs would influence businesses to become their better selves and shift them into more sustainable practices...rewarding them with a label that they would enable and procure.
What actually happened was that the businesses influenced the NGOs to become their tag alongs to maintain their own credibility and allow the illusion of progress and success. Standards were lowered to get the label and at times, even supplied for free.
Todays environmentalist doesn't like to blow the whistle on his new partners and he sure doesn't like it blown on him.
The original culprits are not even known anymore and remain cloaked behind their new agents of "PR and reform."
The time is right for new models and new groups to show the way.
Perhaps the scandals of the big eco-hogs will now make it possible for other, more talented, more effective groups to emerge and grow.![]()
This actually appears to be underway.
Steve