Ironically, those who profess a deep concern for our precious environment tend to predominantly be urbanites who themselves choose to live in an environment where the natural world has been almost completely annihilated. Incongruous too is their fierce rejection of any suggestion that anything may not be a bad as they fear (or apparently hope).
Contrary to popular perception, in most developed countries the overall environmental condition has greatly improved over the past few decades and although much remains to be done the situation good and getting better. Real problems are quite sufficient. We do not need to waste effort and resources on imaginary ones.
Australia with its vast area, small population, remoteness, and high standard of living enjoys one of the least polluted, unspoiled natural environments of any nation. Unfortunately, environmental management here has tended to become dominated by ideology, theories, and a proliferation of bureaucracy with minimal assessment of either the real environment or the socio-economic consequences. Exacerbated by the precautionary principle the result has been a growing morass of restrictions and demands to address problems that often do not exist or that could be addressed by more effective, less burdensome measures. With a prosperity based predominantly on primary production ill-conceived environmental regulations are becoming a far more real threat to national security than is the danger of terrorism.
In the prevailing climate of political correctness concerning environmental matters few scientists are willing to speak out in opposition to the misrepresentation, suppression and outright fraud that is often being perpetrated in connection with environmental issues.
At best it means being shunned by colleagues and almost certainly will have negative career consequences. I have because a combination of age and independence permit, knowledge and experience qualify, and sense of responsibility impel me to do so. The response from those on the receiving end of environmental mismanagement has been gratifying and the private agreement of many researchers surprising.
Eco-ideology
Environmentalism has become a quasi-religious blend of new-age nature worship, junk science, left-wing political activism and anti-profit economics. Saving the environment supports a mini-industry of activists, bureaucrats and researchers all of whom have a vested interest in promoting the idea of threats, which, of course, require more campaigns, more bureaucracy and more research. Misinformed politicians thinking they are doing the right thing and perceiving popularity at little apparent cost have tended to give rubber stamp approval to the environmentalist agenda.
I would add those very well meaning people can do far more harm then good and unfortunately to date they have failled to see ithat.One size simply does not fit all despite the need for simple solutions among well meaning people....
GreshamH":15t74nxq said:If Wayne takes anything away from reading your post Steve I sure hope itsI would add those very well meaning people can do far more harm then good and unfortunately to date they have failled to see ithat.One size simply does not fit all despite the need for simple solutions among well meaning people....
Caterham":2ojr7aj6 said:Naesco,
Thanks so much for your comments on this thread.
There are multiple LD3 containers landing in your very own hometown each and every week from Indonesia and Philippines.
Please explain, in detail, the steps that you have taken in your own hometown to make sure the fish are clean and collected in a sustainable manner.
Many thanks in advance for your reply.
Warmest regards,
cortez marine":3iqva1p9 said:Targeting the industry as a single entity has always befuddled me.
Just who is the industry?
Where can we find their chief? Are they like isolated tribes yet brought to unification...and civilization? Who speaks for them...or purports to speak for them?
steve
All those who make money from this trade can be considered as members of this industry.
stevethose who make money from this trade
Caterham":34356ggu said:Naesco,
Thanks so much for the reply. Unfortunately, not a single question I asked was addressed.
I am not asking about LFS in your area. I am not asking about hobbyists in your area. I am not asking your opinion on what species are suitable.
What I would like to know is if you are in contact with the importers in your area that are landing the containers. LFS in your area may very well be purchasing from vendors in the United States of America and having them shipped in, thus making them entirely irrelevant as it relates to my questions.
If importers in your area are importing fish that are not collected in what you feel to be the correct fashion, per your own words, they should be put in gaol.
The only way to be certain you are dealing with Indo and Flip fish is to speak with the importer and ask to inspect the shipment. You have stated repeatedly that the importers are to blame, in your opinion.
How many of the LD3 containers landing in YOUR OWN HOMETOWN from the areas you are most concerned about are you inspecting? Are you speaking with the importers? Are you finding out the exporter contact information? What are the results of your tests? When will you be attempting to prosecute these folks IN YOUR HOMETOWN?
cortez marine":2h3ya3l4 said:All those who make money from this trade can be considered as members of this industry.
So would that also include "reform" groups that have fed off the trade for so many years...... and left nothing but dirty dishes in the sink?
Or are they still immunue from responsibility despite the fact that they are amongstevethose who make money from this trade![]()