Yep the new Pro is impressive. Now the questions. What MH Reflector? This can make a HUGE difference in par numbers. I would like to see the par the Radion is throwing 12" off center of puck.
No doubt LED's have punch. Anything w optics will. And the main reason 9/10 people bleach their stuff.
What I want to see is a long term study of at least 1-2 years of the same tank lit by both fixtures. Like what Vivid is doing. But Long Term.
Whats the price on the Pro?
If the PAR is enough to grow corals in your tank why do we care about these numbers beyond that point? Clearly, better LED's provide enough PAR to grow coral in even the deepest tanks, but they are limited by their spread and to an increasingly lesser degree by their spectral and aesthetic qualities.
For larger tanks they are still prohibitively expensive IMO compared to other options, for smaller systems the gap has narrowed. I think we are past the days where LEDs need to prove their ability to grow anything. Now it is down to cost, features, aesthetics and appropriate application on a given system.
Frankly, I think many people over light their tanks. Heck, I used to grow Acropora under normal out put florescent tubes. I'm not sure why every new technology introduced turns into a pissing match even after the evidence suggests they are effective. All the available reef lighting options work if they are applied correctly.
Thanks for directing me to the thread selkoner. I did not want to post on the Radion thread but had felt compelled to. Anyway just got back from and install and dead tired. I will catch up and hopefully have a coversation about this.
even if led are getting better mh still got them cook and i will run mh till they stop making the bulbs i don't really care what other are running on there tanks the colors etc the only advantage to me is the less electric that consume and that is offset buy the ridiculous price some of these unit cost