Jaime, Steve, Mike, et al:
Are we done now?
Uhmmm, there's this massive shyte-load of problems that need solving,
and while I'm not 100% certain this Forum can do anything to help
find a solution...
This spitefest sure as hell can't.
Jaime,
If Steve is taking potshots at NGO's, then yes, there ought to be some evidence to back it up. His credentials and history with some of those very same NGO's counts in my book. As acrid as his criticisms are, they are nevertheless a potential source of useful information towards change. As I suggested to John above, there's a lot of wealth to be mined out of perceived criticisms.
Steve,
You DO believe in redemption, right?
Maybe these NGO lemons can redeem themselves.
Not a bad idea to leave the door of cordiality just a crack open, no?
If I could bite my tongue while ignorant collectors in the 80's explained to me just how they used cyanide, it was because I was aiming to reform them with information and a bit of training.
Maybe it's time to train these NGO's in reef-safe NGO-ing.
How would you talk to a trainee?
Mike,
I agree that MAC is quite a bit past the honeymoon stage to excuse gaping lapses.
If it is sloppy, then we can suggest ways to rationalize its battle orders.
If it is ignoring good advice, then we keep trying to advise while taking comfort in the fact that MAC is not the only game in town.
If MAC is being exclusionary ---wanting to BE the only game in town, then yeah... I'd have a pretty serious problem with that, since they haven't got their game down, and it's unfair to others who DO. Others are already delivering totally netcaught to the US market.
Folks, I'm not asking that we paper over our differences and hurts, make peace and unite under one organization! I'm just asking for the identification of SPECIFIC problems that can be discussed towards finding a workable solution. These specific problems can get shrouded in the very way we present them.
Ferdie's post brought one problem to light: result switching once outside of CDT Lab.
I say one solution is babysitting the test specimens and test results.
Surely you can find a way to have trustworthy reps keep an eye on any crucial CDT and results for the couple of days it takes in Quezon City (or wherever the sample is being tested). Any takers?
Our rickety boat is fighting heavy seas, and we need every hand on deck.
Some of those on board will be less useful, less competent, less honest than I'd like, but maybe we can be choosy after we make it to harbor.
Are we done now?
Uhmmm, there's this massive shyte-load of problems that need solving,
and while I'm not 100% certain this Forum can do anything to help
find a solution...
This spitefest sure as hell can't.
Jaime,
If Steve is taking potshots at NGO's, then yes, there ought to be some evidence to back it up. His credentials and history with some of those very same NGO's counts in my book. As acrid as his criticisms are, they are nevertheless a potential source of useful information towards change. As I suggested to John above, there's a lot of wealth to be mined out of perceived criticisms.
Steve,
You DO believe in redemption, right?
Maybe these NGO lemons can redeem themselves.
Not a bad idea to leave the door of cordiality just a crack open, no?
If I could bite my tongue while ignorant collectors in the 80's explained to me just how they used cyanide, it was because I was aiming to reform them with information and a bit of training.
Maybe it's time to train these NGO's in reef-safe NGO-ing.
How would you talk to a trainee?
Mike,
I agree that MAC is quite a bit past the honeymoon stage to excuse gaping lapses.
If it is sloppy, then we can suggest ways to rationalize its battle orders.
If it is ignoring good advice, then we keep trying to advise while taking comfort in the fact that MAC is not the only game in town.
If MAC is being exclusionary ---wanting to BE the only game in town, then yeah... I'd have a pretty serious problem with that, since they haven't got their game down, and it's unfair to others who DO. Others are already delivering totally netcaught to the US market.
Folks, I'm not asking that we paper over our differences and hurts, make peace and unite under one organization! I'm just asking for the identification of SPECIFIC problems that can be discussed towards finding a workable solution. These specific problems can get shrouded in the very way we present them.
Ferdie's post brought one problem to light: result switching once outside of CDT Lab.
I say one solution is babysitting the test specimens and test results.
Surely you can find a way to have trustworthy reps keep an eye on any crucial CDT and results for the couple of days it takes in Quezon City (or wherever the sample is being tested). Any takers?
Our rickety boat is fighting heavy seas, and we need every hand on deck.
Some of those on board will be less useful, less competent, less honest than I'd like, but maybe we can be choosy after we make it to harbor.