A
Anonymous
Guest
greenighs":3p7ujey4 said:Snailman":3p7ujey4 said:greenighs":3p7ujey4 said:double.
I believe the proper term is "Milzed" :wink:
I thought "Milzed" was for deleting content you changed your mind about, not deleting a double post.
That is correct.
As for this particular subject, personally, if I were still in the hobby I would like to do what would benefit people in countries such as the Philipines, Indonesia, etcetera. They are, after all, the real wardens of the environs hobbyists value, and if they are not supported then there will be at least the ramification of further detrimental exploitation. If that means going with their net-caughts, I might go in that direction. It really all depends, but I won't say that it's necessarily or automatically better to go with, for instance, U.S. maricultured, not with what I know of the issues with maricultured food grade organisms.
For our seafood needs, we have determined that what is actually healthier -- both for our consumption and long term ecological health -- is to purchase specific U.S. wild-caught rather than certain cultured species. Take, for instance, the Mexican shrimp mariculture, which is fraught with terrible problems and isn't very good for consumption after all. Salmon fisheries are another good example whose lessons should be extrapolated in marine ornamental culture.